Man Discusses Gun That Was Used In The Killing of Bigfoot at Bluff Creek


M.K. Davis thinks there may be something to this "Bluff Creek massacre" theory. His interview with an old bear hunter from the Bluff Creek, who claims that he has a gun that was used in the killing of Bigfoot in the Bluff Creek Ca. area, seems to support the theory. The Bigfoot community has mostly rejected the controversial theory. According to Davis, the Roger Patterson party probably went to Bluff Creek many times before to look for Bigfoot, and one of those times, they managed to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis pointed to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Howdy everyone, hope you are all the bees knees!

      Delete
    2. yeah yeah yeah, whatever. What do you think of the story?

      Delete
    3. I lean towards no massacre happening. I think the color is off in the film and so I personally can't clearly see blood and skin. But, I highly respect MK and I have been wrong before. Thanks for asking ;)

      Delete
    4. What is your take, dear anon with bees knees?

      Delete
    5. Look at how red things are in general in that picture, including their skin. Colour/tint is off a fair bit.

      Delete
    6. I've just listened to that interview after Mike mentioned it on the previous post,not sure what to make of it,it could have happened but how would you shoot the second bigfoot before it's taken your head off?.
      Also Mike,that photo you have of the bigfoot on its belly,is it just me or does it look like this one? xx

      http://www.bigfootbuzz.net/bigfoot-hunters-from-past-pose-with-quarry/

      Delete
    7. I just listened to it and it sounded like MK had a feeling that the gentleman had something of great DNA significance... And ever so slightly pressed that.

      Delete
    8. MK NEEDS TO STOP WITH THIS FOOLISHNESS!!

      HEY EVA, JOE!

      ALL CAPS

      Delete
    9. MK sent me this this morning and I've been mulling it over. Did John Green get a phone call stating "what you are looking for is here". Did Roget and Bob just happen to be there at exactly the right time. I believe 3 living people know the absolute truth. M

      Delete
    10. I agree Eva. It's the first subject I've seen with what appears to be male pattern baldness. :)

      Delete
    11. Mike... Check out the Harvey Pratt drawings on Google image search, a couple of them appear to be rather bald.

      Delete
    12. Joe that's fascinating. I wish I knew if that trait was selective to the genus Homo. It's very intriguing. Joe I found 2 more huge stick "igloo" looking structures like the one in that picture. That Subject had a sharp stick in his hand and I had no idea he was 20 feet behind me. He didn't appear to want me anywhere around.

      Delete
    13. It's the apparent shoulder size of the subject that amazes me Mike. Also... The stick looks like the traditional limb break that is reported to be used by them as clubs, does it not?

      Delete
    14. Yes. You hit it on the head Joe. No pun of course ;)

      Delete
    15. I wouldn't be surprised if some bigfoot did lose their hair and or go grey,i think you need be careful Mike,20 foot from a bigfoot with a sharp stick sounds a bit iffy xx

      Delete
    16. It's a lot safer than most of my first dates with Alamo Heights women !

      Delete
    17. Damn I guess we still have white out conditions

      Delete
    18. Wow Mike Brookreson, just checked out your photos! Amazing! Gave me a chill. Really really good work. Thank you for sharing them.

      Delete
    19. Harry. I don't know if you know it. But I've been on your anti whiteout campaign for a while. Hope all is well brother. Had a second root canal today. They've given me some medication that makes me talk and look like Christopher Walken.

      Delete
    20. Thanks Chick. There's a ton of em on my Google Plus account. A few on Facebook. Help yourself. Many are blobby but a few I don't know how anyone can deny what they are. Three now have been authenticated as presumably "living" subjects by experts. I would write a book and publish them but many people would think their glasses were getting bad and Shawn might whitewash my content. :)

      Delete
    21. 'Experts' in this field Mike?

      Surely you jest!

      MMG

      Delete
    22. I will surely check them out. You must have put a good amount of time into getting them. I cant stop going back and looking at the blackish grey one sitting on the ground. Looks as if there may be a redish one behind him- a little eye shine? What blows me away is that this is during the day.

      Delete
    23. Photographs of subjects casting shadows and showing movement Every photo is pulled from stream video and yes I often jest, just don't call me Shirley. :)

      Delete
    24. Now MMG. I'm not here hawking anything. Some people paid me compliments and I responded. I have never copyrighted not presented anything for a penny so save your ever present judgment for Todd S or some other individual my learned friend.

      Delete
    25. MMG I see you on here critical of many people, theories and positions. Does MMG stand for many misgivings. What exactly are you for??

      Delete
    26. Nevermind. I'm sure you've got it all figured out. I just realized you actually acted as if their were "experts" in the Bigfoot field. My first lesson when I began this a odyssey 2 years ago was that there is no true expert, only opinions. And you know what they say about those. Good Day.

      Delete
    27. I'm tryin mike it seems every day a little less gets white out so our efforts are not in vain although I'm pretty damn sexy if I do say so myself

      Delete
    28. Oh and thank you Chick and Eva. It's so very refreshing to exchange with people like you guys and Ernie. Never let the cynicism rife in this silly field take away your curiosity or the fun of the wonder of it all. Chat with you very soon. M

      Delete
    29. Harry. You can't help that The Lord made you that way. Take it easy and tell Stevie hey for me.

      Delete
  2. bigfoots jihadist in the bush

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bigfoot was killed, then sliced into select cuts and eaten as sandwiches. They were served at a Bigfoot conference as roastbeef with horseradish sauce. Many people that ate them said they were the best sandwiches they ever ate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. tham bigfoots takin folks out for years, about time folks get some payback

      Delete
  4. send in the BLM troopers they got the firepower to take out bigfoots

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great news people. I just found out that I didn't need surgery to become a Eunuch. Cause the Doctor said that I'm already one. Wow, life is great.

    D.Campbell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His balls are missing? MSNBC will give him his own show. What size birth control glasses does he wear?

      Delete
    2. That's great news. No eunuch. Perhaps an Enoch!!

      Delete
  6. put the AIMS Team on it.buck, trapper john, fukleberry and all them masterbaters will figure it out hoora

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trapper got a track record better than the BLMs record

      Delete
    2. Well be certainly knew enough to interview credible witnesses like "Fish" and "Possum" and he was well versed in that distinct Yahoo yell which delineates that group!!

      Delete
    3. tham YAHOOs outwitted Trapper and the team. AIMS needs a better trap next time to trap a YAHOO.....

      Delete
    4. They were simply not prepared for a "whole damn family of Yahoos"

      Delete
    5. And YOU PEOPLE believe it? Pathetic!

      Delete
    6. DSA 4:14, do you really believe that is what we believe? Or is it more probable that we are entertained

      Delete
  7. The publishing of this libelous MK Davis diatribe, is prima facia evidence that Shawn Evidence should not be permitted to own a website. It is virtually impossible to be more disrespectful of Bob Gimlin, than to publish this completely bogus analysis by MK Davis that is strewn with falsehoods and isolated color manipulation of the photos, in order to show red blood that never existed at the time. Shawn Evidence needs to be taken out behind the woodpile for publishing this fraud.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe did u watch north shore diaries yet?? Ttl

      Delete
    2. Bob Gimlin deserves no respect.

      Delete
    3. I'm gonna sit down and watch it in a little while my friend... Looking forward to it!!

      Delete
    4. I never caught the part where MK said one disparaging thing about Bob nor the part where Shawn Evidence did anything resembling besmirching Bob. DSA do refresh my recollection if you will.

      Delete
    5. Never thought much of the Bluff Creek massacre theory.

      Harmed MK's rep in a big way however.

      Unfortunately folks focus on his poor judgment here and not on his excellent earlier PGF work.

      MMG

      Delete
    6. Listen to that voice!!! That is Rick Dyer !!! For Shure in that interview lol he did it agian!! Ttl Garuntee that's Rick D!!

      Delete
    7. What folks MMG. You want to play the PGF purists and jump on him for the Sells stuff or claim the Bluff Creek Massacre stuff, which was a term originally used by another Bigfoot personality harmed him. MK is stronger and more active than ever. Don't assume because yourself or a group whose values you decry and espouse feels this way that it's gospel. When I feel a bit better and when you're up to it I'll gladly do a Blogtalk radio show or a post for Shawn where you and I simply go head to head. I can think of nothing more fun than taking on the very worthy MMG. Think it over. I'll make the time

      Delete
    8. Or if you prefer, I'll ask Joe and he and I will step over to your beloved Bigfoot Forums for a day of fun. I'm sure we can make it Interesting. Maybe Bipto can give Summar a day of amnesty to judge it. Whatever the terms I'll slip on my size 12 Tony Llama Crocodiiles and firmly ensconce them in someone's ass. After that we can go back to being buddies. Cause despite your judgmental tones, I like you. I'll be arround. M

      Delete
    9. Be carefull mike B,, HENRY MAY is quite the debate master,,as mnbrt.. " might give y'all a venue, fer some of yer jive turkey Smackdown,??

      Delete
    10. But then again this subject matter is Way old and most likley too confrontational for ole Henry May,,,

      Delete
  8. I once had a bigfoot. Tasted like chicken

    ReplyDelete
  9. No way anyone shoots a bigfoot and doesn't bring a body to show proof. This world is motivated by money, and money a "real" dead bigfoot would bring is too much to pass on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't mike about that. You might ask BRFO researcher Sybilla Irwin how she felt after she did the Smeja recreations. I've heard she felt enough veracity was inherent in the tale to be very emotional at the recreation and rendering and she's about as highly regarded as they come. M

      Delete
    2. What if you shot a Sasquatch, only to find it so human that you'd be terrified of commiting murder??

      Delete
    3. It seems to be the prevailing sentiment of virtually everyone who claims to have shot one. Except the "shooter" who took a pot shot at the female subject known as Haloti near the Sells site. She was rumored to have been gifted and seen carrying a bible. Despite that some fella tried to shoot her in the back. His goal allegedly was to capture the child she was with. Steve Summar is about to unleash on the shooters of the world. I feel it in my bones.

      Delete
  10. Trapper and da (AIMS) team takin a huntin Werewolf of Webster County, Willy and Wild Bill a trap building. Buck @ the point and Huckleberry @ da 6 ...... huntin @ night guns @ the ready - no worries its all good

    ReplyDelete
  11. thank GOD, obama for obamacare to save US all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could you refresh my recollection on the dangers of walkabouts?

      Delete
    2. Hahaaha! day get cha fer sure on dim (something like that?) if you be walkin to fer ahead on da trail..right aroud da bend..

      Delete
    3. It brightens every day for those safety tips. :)

      Delete
    4. bigfoots eats - bear, deer, elk, hogs, dogs, cats, and folks on walkabouts

      Delete
    5. 2:13 my always aware pseudo Rasta friend. I believe it verbatim.

      Delete
  12. Someone's having the obvious fun with the gullible bigfooters....

    ReplyDelete
  13. FB/FB has the gun that killed Hank

    ReplyDelete
  14. Every time Mk is mentioned my dick hole starts to hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  15. One major bug in the ointment regarding MK Davis's grand theory, is that since all those important people were in Bluff Creek to gather what evidence they could find to corroborate the Patterson-Gimlin film, why would they leave a Bigfoot hide that could only come from a Bigfoot body, BEHIND? That just doesn't make sense. The truth fits seemlessly into the puzzle, whereas falsehoods leave major questions unresolved. MK Davis's theory was therefore a complete falsehood. There was no body nor Bigfoot hide left behind nor even snookered away. Because no Bigfoot were harmed in conjunction with the filming of the Patterson-Gimlin film.

    ReplyDelete
  16. There is no chain of evidence proof to a claimed gun by a claimed person who claimed to have received a rifle from a KNOWN HOAXER, IVAN MARX. Ivan Marx made several hoaxed videos with a limping Bigfoot. Tom Biscardi, another known hoaxer, claimed to be a witness in those videos. You just can't make this stuff up, it is so ridiculous.

    This video by MK Davis is a crock. Gold in hole in a rifle stock? Maybe the owner shot someone and that figured out that he was a liar, and that was his way of marking the event.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Here is some Ivan Marx hoaxed videos:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dExfDsTzyE

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gK--v1j0L3E

    Notice how the person MC'ing these videos, uses "hoaxed" over and over to describe Ivan Marx's gift for being in the right place at the right time. And now, we have MK Davis giving publicity to a supposed rifle involved in MK's own completely fabricated massacre scenario, THAT SUPPOSEDLY CAME FROM IVAN MARX. This is not exactly a good choice of persons in the chain of ownership, if one were attempting to authenticate the MK Davis hallucinated massacre based on authencating a rifle. roflmao

    Am I the only one seeing a pattern forming here of COMPLETE AND TOTAL INSANITY?

    ReplyDelete
  18. A little geometry on the shadows in the Patterson film shows that the film supposedly taken in October was actually shot much earlier in the summer. Gimlin clearly is hiding a lot, and it is about time that he 'fessed up.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Here is how the photo at the top of this thread, is completely mislabeled by MK Davis.

    http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/massacre-mess/

    This article describes MK Davis and Paulides as supporting the massacre theory. There were two more. Beelart and Bobby Short. Short is no longer alive to defend herself. Beelart is. Both Paulides and Beelart have admitted to having financial backers. My theory is that the same financial backer directed Davis, Paulides and Beelart to support the massacre theory. Since MK Davis likes theories, we will see how he likes this theory.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story