Survivorman Bigfoot - Episode Two Airs Tonight on Discovery Channel


Alright, fans of Survivorman. The American episode of Surivorman Bigfoot, Episode 2 is airing tonight. Our DVR is set for 10pm. Will they find proof of Bigfoot, or will they find something else? Find out tonight on Discovery Channel as Todd Standing and Les Stroud ventures further into the Canadian wilderness to look for evidence of the North American wood ape. If you missed week's interview with Les, check out the Bigfoot North podcast below:

Comments

  1. Here's the deal. You will never learn of the existence of Bigfoot from a TV series. In the event that they capture a clear picture of a bonafide Squatch on film while filming an episode of whatever, you will hear about it long before the episode airs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True.

      Nevertheless want to watch Les. See what happens. The guy is smart and a straightshooter.

      Delete
    2. 100 percent correct. I feel bad for Les. Being led around by an obvious hoaxer. Wish he would be alone out there.

      Delete
    3. No matter what one thinks of Standing, he can not control what does and does not happen in a remote or even local forest. He showed me last week that he has a quite good clue of bigfoot forest signs. I know Les was impressed and probably sees the forest in a whole new light.

      Chuck

      Delete
    4. If nothing else he gave a much better look at the so called tree structures than the average You Tube video. They obviously aren't just there by happenstance. Someone or something had to put in the effort to make them and they don't look like they were put there just for Les' benefit. That would be a lot of work done over a long time for a payoff that might not ever come. Oh, and Les took a shot at the Four Twits of the Oblivious. That made the whole thing worthwhile in and of itself.

      Delete
    5. If they did or do capture a clear picture or video of Big Foot it still wouldn't matter. The majority of people will call it Hoax cause it's To Good, To Clear, Must be Fake. To Blurry or Unfocused than it Must be Fake. That is the Only answer you will ever get from society. Reality is only Reality if the Main Stream Media or Government says it's Real. Ironically their the Least untrustworthy sources of what's True or Real. We live in a Conditioned World. Your conditioned to Not Believe what you see wit your own eyes. That your gut, or instincts, aren't real. The only thing that's Real is what they tell you is Real. Not you personally or any 1 persons, or 1 million separate persons, beliefs that matter. Only They Can confirm it or allow science an atmosphere where they aren't afraid for their careers to pursue even what they believe. That's how you control information and Write History the way you want. The powers That be truly do control Reality

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. the word on the street(sesame) was you passed away what gives?

      Delete
    2. Hes trying to count the hoaxers. He says there are too many to count.

      Delete
    3. Count ...welcome back. You are a far better muppet than the one they accuse Todd of using. And it's good to see you.

      Delete
  3. Sweeeeeet.... another TV show about how not to find a sasquatch. TV sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Standing is the man.....Rush rules

    ReplyDelete
  5. " Les tries to find irrefutable proof"

    And he'll be trying for an awfully long time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why do bigfoot enthusiasts associate themselves with an obvious fraud like Standing?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Because a "Bigfoot enthusiast" which quite frankly sounds like a pussy, but that aside, for an individual who self identifies with the subject matter, appreciates the fact that he's taken multiple parties out there and they've professed real experiences and furthermore he leaves a "standing" invitation out there for the nonbeliever to come on up. No pun intended. So these researchers who may be new or use unconventional methods who invite people to join them based on their success rate, that creates a kindred spirit with others who hold out the same invitation based on their self confidence with their own abilities, and success rates, namely me. Whether or not he may or may not have used a prop for promotional purposes vas that's highly debatable, he can produce. Now if it's proven he lied about a prop and touted it as real to promote his endeavors, that's a different deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's obvious he lied and IS lying to this date about the prop.

      Word is he also betrayed confidences to find the area in which to promote his agenda with the scientists. There will be more to come, but he's still a liar.

      Delete
  8. Look. Maybe I could have used a more politically correct word. But it's how I feel about that monicker. "Bigfoot Enthusiat". It sounds like a pimply faced punk who dropped his park map when he lost his chocolate bar. The " Bigfoot Community" is a fractured group of jealous back biting desperate housewives. Now I've gotta go. I'm low on moisturizer.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oh my goodness!!! Standing is a serial hoaxer!!! A fraud!!! A liar!!! Why do you people still give this guy credibility???!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because he doesn't over use punctuation marks. Duh.

      Delete
  10. What!!!!!!!! In!!!!!! The,, hells....... HANDBASKET,,,,, ARE YA GOING ON ABOUT??????????????????? My,, friend!!!.???!!??,"':...??

    ReplyDelete
  11. There are 3 types of hoaxers

    1) Those who are out to make fools of BF believers and get off on feeling superior on how easy you can fool people with blurry video and a fake costume.

    2) Those who believe and/or may have had an experience and wants so bad to prove it's existence.

    3) Those out for money and notoriety.

    Standing is #2

    His blinking BF is obviously GCI. Although it's the best looking muppet of the three. His passion and dedication make me want to believe him - his "evidence" does not.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I've never seen such interesting close-ups of.......moss.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. There is no real evidence and never has been. It is unfortunate that Les Stroud has decided to co-opt his credibility in order to produce more episodes that will pay him to continue to explore and enjoy his life experiences. I can't think of any other reason why he would do this.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Whatever you may say about Les Stroud going Bigfoot. He wouldn't have done any of this (risk his reputation) unless it meant ratings. At it's peak, there were about 5-6 ghost hunting/investigation type shows. I have no doubt that we will see more Bigfoot shows.

    ReplyDelete
  16. if they are going to put apples on a tree at least have a trail cam to catch video of whats taking the apples

    ReplyDelete
  17. I wish I had seen the show.
    I set it up to record,when I watched it,it was another rerun of Naked & Afraid.
    I'm at the point that I'm ready to remove Discovery from my channels.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is just silly. Les's logic is very poor. He says the trees could have been done by a person or a bigfoot... it must be a bigfoot. That is like saying the hoof prints are either from a unicorn or a horse. Must be a unicorn. That is not evidence at all. It is just bad logic. It is clear that the guy with Les is a lier. He has wild claims of understanding the bigfoot but only had brief encounters. How the hell would he know they want the high ground without studying their behavior over several instances? He wouldn't. Same is true for the meaning of the broken tree directions. He would have to have repeated evidence to show their meaning. Even by his own claims of his bigfoot contact he wouldn't any real evidence to make those conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This is just silly. Les's logic is very poor. He says the trees could have been done by a person or a bigfoot... it must be a bigfoot. That is like saying the hoof prints are either from a unicorn or a horse. Must be a unicorn. That is not evidence at all. It is just bad logic. It is clear that the guy with Les is a lier. He has wild claims of understanding the bigfoot but only had brief encounters. How the hell would he know they want the high ground without studying their behavior over several instances? He wouldn't. Same is true for the meaning of the broken tree directions. He would have to have repeated evidence to show their meaning. Even by his own claims of his bigfoot contact he wouldn't any real evidence to make those conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is just silly. Les's logic is very poor. He says the trees could have been done by a person or a bigfoot... it must be a bigfoot. That is like saying the hoof prints are either from a unicorn or a horse. Must be a unicorn. That is not evidence at all. It is just bad logic. It is clear that the guy with Les is a lier. He has wild claims of understanding the bigfoot but only had brief encounters. How the hell would he know they want the high ground without studying their behavior over several instances? He wouldn't. Same is true for the meaning of the broken tree directions. He would have to have repeated evidence to show their meaning. Even by his own claims of his bigfoot contact he wouldn't any real evidence to make those conclusions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was thinking the same exact thing. How does that guy know that the bigfoot prefers the high ground without ever actually studying them? Wouldn't most animals prefer the high ground? He really went out on a limb there, huh? I expected more out of Les too. He really sold out this time, & does anyone expect him to find any conclusive bigfoot evidence? I didn't think so.. shame on you Les.

      Delete
  21. Fact: Giganto pithacus existed. Bones and teeth were found and continue to be found in the caves of Viet Nam. Did these creatures migrate across the Bering Strait land bridge into North America and still exist today? Its possible. But Todd Standing video of the creature blinking? It think its a hoax. Who blinks like that? Its like some yelled "OK, now BlinK!" Its too deliberate. Second, he is too clean. Where are all the matts, twigs and leaves that would be in his hair. If I were living out in the woods like that, my hair would be a mess. He looks like he just came from the groomers. If they do exist today, its going to take someone like Les to find one. Its going to take time out in the woods, not just a few hours. Maybe Standing did have experiences but could only fake some evidence in order to get Les's attention to take him seriously. I do think his theory on the structures and the bent limbs to be compelling. Way up in Alaska on an island there, there is a tree, a huge old dead tree that was uprooted and turned upside down, roots up. No chain marks, no ax marks. WTF? Its true. Maybe something is out there, but he isnt going to look like he just he just got a haircut!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you ever seen a silverback gorilla their hair ain't matted no sticks or leaves on there fur

      Delete
  22. You idiots didnt even see the show they had 2 clear pics a still photo of a reddish one then a video of a darker one blinking its eyes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apparently, Todd finally admitted in private, that he cited his movie making license and manufactured those unblinking heads and/or had his expert makeup artist wife, make him look like a Bigfoot. Since virtually no one has seen them up close, whose going to know?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story