BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Uno!
ReplyDeleteQuis custodiet ipsos custodes.....
DeleteAPPLEs iphones apps track U for your SAFETY
DeleteI wonder if he cried liked Joe
DeleteAs our world dies you a-hole hipsters and such worry about some queer phone to make you think your cooler than the next loser. The funny thing is your smart phone has made you dumber than you were in high school. LOSERS
DeleteU gots the world @ U finger tips
Delete"And Cain knew his wife." That's nice, but where the hell did she come from? 4:17
DeleteGod tells Noah to make one small window (18 inches square) in the 450 foot ark for ventilation. 6:16
Delete"Be ye fruitful, and multiply." With 6 billion people on this planet, we need to disobey God on this one. 9:7
DeleteGW GODs WILL
DeleteNice first Uno xx
DeleteOver 7 billion now 11:57 xx
Abraham circumcises himself and all of the males in his household. Since he supposedly had 318 slaves back in 14:14, poor old Abe must have been pretty busy with his knife. But it was worth it. Penisies are supremely important to God. And he can't stand foreskins. 17:23-24
DeleteHi Eva! Uno!
DeleteJacob displays his (and God's) knowledge of biology by having goats copulate while looking at streaked rods. The result is streaked baby goats. 30:37-39
DeleteAbraham lived to be 175 years old. 25-7
DeleteIshmael lives 137 years. 25:17
Isaac lives to be 180. 35:28
Jacob lives to be 147. 47:28
Admitting That Gun Control Doesn’t Work,
DeleteD.C. Mayor Calls For More Gun Control
FOR YOUR SAFETY : )
God decides to kill Moses because his son had not yet been circumcised. Luckily for Moses, his Egyptian wife Zipporah "took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me. So he [God] let him go." This story shows the importance of penises to God, and his hatred of foreskins. 4:24-26
DeleteGOD all knowing all seeing and all powerful
DeleteGod gives detailed instructions for performing ritualistic animal sacrifices. such bloody rituals must be important to God, judging from the number of times that he repeats their instructions. Indeed the entire first nine chapters of Leviticus can be summarized as follows: Get an animal, kill it, sprinkle the blood around, cut the dead animal into pieces, and burn it for a "sweet savor unto the Lord." Chapters 1 - 9 When you are making your animal sacrifices, be sure to remember that "all the fat is the Lord's." God loves blood and guts, but most especially fat. And he doesn't like to share! 3:16
DeleteGod's treatment for leprosy: Get two birds. Kill one. Dip the live bird in the blood of the dead one. Sprinkle the blood on the leper seven times, and then let the blood-soaked bird fly off. Next find a lamb and kill it. Wipe some of its blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle seven times with oil and wipe some of the oil on his right ear, thumb and big toe. Repeat. Finally kill a couple doves and offer one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. 14:2-32
DeleteThis passage tells you what to do if you get your "seed of copulation" on yourself, your clothes, or your partner. Thank God this is in the Bible. 15:16-18, 32
DeleteHandicapped people cannot approach the altar of God. They would "profane" it. 21:16-23
DeleteGod gives us more instructions on killing and burning animals. I guess the first nine chapters of Leviticus wasn't enough. He says we must do this because he really likes the smell -- it is "a sweet savour unto the Lord." 23:12-14, 18
Delete"And there we saw the giants ... And we were in our own sight as grasshopper, and so we were in their sight." According to this description, then, the giants must have been about 300 feet tall. These are the same giants (the Nephilium) that resulted when the "sons of God" mated with "the daughters of men in Gen.6:4. Of course these superhuman god-men should have been destroyed in the flood. So what are they doing still alive? 13:33
DeleteOMG xx
DeleteDon't eat any seafood unless it has fins and scales. Oysters, clams, crabs, and lobsters are "unclean" and shouldn't be eaten. 14:10
DeleteYou can't go to church if your testicles are damaged or your penis has been cut off. 23:1
DeleteGod won't let bastards attend church. Neither can the sons or daughters of bastards "even to the tenth generation." So if you plan to attend church next Sunday be ready to prove that your genitals are intact and don't forget your birth certificate and genealogical records for at least the last ten generations. Don't laugh. This stuff is important to God. 23:2
DeleteBig jon is in Love with joes foreskin,,, FACT!!!
DeleteAt God's command, Joshua makes some knives and circumcises "again the children of Israel the second time" (ouch!) at the "hill of the foreskins." 5:2-3
DeletePoor Joshua must have had trouble with math. He says there are 29 cities in verse 32, but he lists 38 in verses 21-32. Then he says there were 14 cities in verse 36, but lists 15 in verses 33-36. 15:32, 36
DeleteGod is angry at Israel so he sells them to the Philistines. He had previously sold them to the kings of Mesopotamia (3:8) and Canaan (4:2). He's such a shrewd businessman! 10:7
DeleteSamson, after "going in unto" a harlot, takes the doors, gate, and posts of the city and carries them to the top of a hill. Why did he do this? Did God make him do it or was he just showing off? The Bible doesn't say. 16:3
Delete1;00 OMG xx
DeleteDavid kills 200 Philistines and brings their foreskins to Saul to buy his first wife (Saul's daughter Michal). Saul had only asked for 100 foreskins, but David was feeling generous. 18:25-27
Delete"And David smote the land and left neither man nor woman alive." (No wonder God liked David so much!) Among those that David exterminated were the Amalekites. But there couldn't have been any Amalekites to kill since Saul killed them all (1 Sam.15:7-8) just a little while before. 27:8-11
Delete"Be ye fruitful, and multiply" i have a question,if Adam and Eve were the first two people and they had children,who did their children have children with? xx
DeleteThe Amalekites are a tough tribe. Twice they were "utterly destroyed": first by Saul (1 Sam.15:7-8) and then by David (1 Sam.27:9-11). Yet here they are, just a few years later, fighting the Israelites again! 30:1
DeleteDavid spends the day killing more of those pesky Amalekites. They are completely wiped out again. (See 1 Sam.15:7-8, 20 and 27:8-9 for the last two times that they were exterminated.) 30:17
GRAY clones they been here for years
DeleteTo confuse you even more Eva
DeleteGod created a man and a woman, and he "called their name Adam." So the woman's name was Adam, too! 5:2
Would you Adam and Eve it lol xx
DeleteGod kills everyone "that pisseth against the wall." 14:10, 16:11, 21:21
DeleteGod sends two bears to rip up 42 little children for making fun of Elisha's bald head. 2:23-24
DeleteAn "angel of the Lord" kills 185,000 men while they sleep. "And when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses." I guess they all woke up and said, "Shucks, I'm dead." 19:35
DeleteSolomon enlists a huge workforce (over 150,000 men) to construct a small chapel. (See 1 Kg.6:2 where the dimensions of the building are given as approximately 90 feet long, 30 feet wide, and 45 feet high.) 2:2
DeleteOBAMA to save US all
Deleteso no worries
Jehoram was 32 years old when he began to reign and he reigned for eight years and then died (a 40 years old). After his death, his youngest son Ahaziah began to reign at the age of 42 (22:1-2). So the son (Ahaziah) was two years older than his father! 21:20, 22:1-2
DeleteIf God made man in his own image does that mean God has a big o dangler? xx
DeleteGod made the heavens with his fingers. 8:3
DeleteSo maybe.
"The meek shall inherit the earth." Will they really? In nature they inherit nothing, but die painful deaths from disease, starvation, and predation. 37:11
DeleteThis is the only verse in the bible that mentions Lucifer. Although most Christians consider Lucifer to be Satan (the devil), there is little biblical justification for doing so. In this verse "Lucifer" refers to the king of Babylon (Nebuchadrezzar?) and Lucifer (the light bearer) is also called the "son of the morning" or morning star. The only other person that is referred to in that way is Jesus (Rev.22:16). Does this mean that Lucifer is Jesus? 14:12
DeleteThere is no god.
DeletePwned.
^ God, pun intended you're dumb
DeleteGod tells us not to trust anyone, not even our family or friends, by saying: "Cursed be the man that trusteth in man." 17:5
DeleteEzekiel experiences what some say is the first recorded UFO sighting. 1:4
DeleteGot monkey?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQlPAFV6yaI
Pwned!!!
DeleteWild Bill old Marine hates tham SnallyGasters
DeleteLEAVE tham critters be !!!
The topic of that vid and the comments below it result in your textbook self-demolition, 9:02.
DeleteStill can't get past Packham's "recreate, to the inch, the action at Bluff Creek," poor sod. With the same camera Patterson used, manned by an amateur operator, 5:00:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7UUPpN7dPU
The same nut who says Packham's "recreate, to the inch, the action at Bluff Creek" = "no attempt to recreate the PGF."
Raging genius, you are.
DeleteNovel little film production here. Problem is, makeup experts have said this technology was not around in the 60's. "Stretch Fur" wasn't invented until quite some time later. Locomotion experts and anthropologists have said the creature is genuine and with modern technology, the film has been cleaned up very well and still no one can prove it false except on bogus theories.
How many men is it now that have come forward and claimed to have been the one in a fur suit?
Strange how no fur suit has ever been found, no one has ever come forward to say they are the genius that made a fur suit that just happened to have expanding and contracting muscle movement below the fur and the list goes on.
There is a hell of a lot more proof of this film being of a genuine creature than anyone has ever come up with it to prove it as a hoax, lest we forget about the plaster casts of "Patty's" footprints that just happen to have dermal ridges. No hoaxer has ever been able to replicate dermal ridges, much less think of them in the first place.
Novel little film but using modern makeup and technology to recreate a nearly fifty year old film just doesn't cut it.
^ hurry up and fack off..Mom`s got your tea of fishfingers and chips ready.
Delete
DeleteNovel little film production here. Problem is, makeup experts have said this technology was not around in the 60's. "Stretch Fur" wasn't invented until quite some time later. Locomotion experts and anthropologists have said the creature is genuine and with modern technology, the film has been cleaned up very well and still no one can prove it false except on bogus theories.
How many men is it now that have come forward and claimed to have been the one in a fur suit?
Strange how no fur suit has ever been found, no one has ever come forward to say they are the genius that made a fur suit that just happened to have expanding and contracting muscle movement below the fur and the list goes on.
There is a hell of a lot more proof of this film being of a genuine creature than anyone has ever come up with it to prove it as a hoax, lest we forget about the plaster casts of "Patty's" footprints that just happen to have dermal ridges. No hoaxer has ever been able to replicate dermal ridges, much less think of them in the first place.
As I said, novel little film but using modern makeup and technology to recreate a nearly fifty year old film just doesn't cut it.
Nice try sweaty dwa
Deletesome of those suits were as old if not older than the bad hair suit.
DeleteJoe got vaped again.
dmaker the sharkhead ^
DeleteOk!! That crap ended up working on a desktop, here's me ripping it apart... I'm slightly embarrassing for stooping so low, but I really had nothing else better to do.
DeleteThe first source; Foam Muscle Suit Test. Ok... You do realize this source is partly CGI, right? You've got some ape dude, likely from the planet of the apes or something having a meltdown (like a certain Canadian & cheerleader over the past 24 hours), who then turns to another subject he's about to have it out with. In these short seconds we have plenty of opportunity to see just how impressive foam muscle can imitate realistic aggressive muscle movements; are we fulfilled? No, we can see that even with the suggested assistance of CGI, we still have no back, neck, spinal erectors, muscle movement in comparison to that of Patty.
http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/p-g44-buresh/
We have what's very obviously a massive budgeted movie that can choose it's preference of lighting, can choose how much CGI it wants to incorporate, and still we have nothing that closely resembles organic tissue the same way as Patty displays. Also... People weren't using foam muscle suits in the late 60's, pointless even suggesting it really.
Next source we see; Ray 'Crash' Corrigan in the famous Gemora suit. Take it away Bill!
"It's obvious you like Gamora's gorilla, and it is a fine gorilla costume for the time, but it is apples and artichokes when compared to the PGF.
The head mask has the high forhead dome, the PGF figure does not.
The fur is very long and shaggy, which obscures any specific body contours like muscles, folds or fatty deposits, but the PGF subject has hair short enough to see the body muscle masses, folds and fatty deposits.
Gamora's costume was designed for a quadrapedal character, and there are ways to cheat the leg/back proportions when doing so, but these cheats don't work for a bipedal figure like the PGF.
Gamora's suit is always photographed under dramatic lighting, which allows for hiding a multitude of costume sins, but Patty was photographed under harsh direct sunlight nearly straight on her, the most unforgiving of lighting, so comparing photos of the two is problematic by the variable of lighting.
It's a poor comparison for any analysis and any claims trying to use that costume to prove Patty's a costume will fail under any formal analysis which factors in the variables."
The third source we see in the video is of Jonas Prohaska and a knee cap comparison. For starters, we don't see Peohaska's suit in motion, at all... So any realistic comparison is pretty much void at this point. I found the comparison so bad to look at that it was almost pointless; you cannot make out much detail at all as the two sources are too pixelated. If only we could see both sources in motion, would we be able to see if the feet of the suit Prohaska is wearing, has anything that resembles this;
Delete"Carl Olinsolet recently posted this intriguing enhancement video on Facebook. The video shows the lower legs and feet of the subject of the Patterson-Gimlin Film, and focuses on the toes of this animal. A feature, which I have noticed, is that the toes lift excessively, possibly due to limitation in dorsiflexion of the ankle joint. Here is Mr. Olinoslet's video, which does a nice job of pointing out this feature in the animal's foot"
http://bizarrezoology.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/compelling-evidence-toe-extension-of.html
But no... What we have is a knee cap comparison that looks like any over pixelated bent limb; oh how damning. Janos Prohaska also stated that if the film was hoaxed, it was remarkably realistic and sophisticated, and the best costume he had ever seen. Funny that someone so aquainted with costumes of the day couldn't rule it out being real, eh?
Next we see a what appears to be an artificial suit leg that looks like a hip wader, that in the final comparison shot doesn't have the upper leg proportions that Patty has. Also, any artificial suit leg would have to be able to mimic the locomotion of a real leg, to the point in which it can manoever properly walking, we see this in the upper knee of the artificial limb obviously designed for such bending. This doubles up as mimicing muscle mass above the knee. Therefore, this genius' premise is to use an imitation of a leg as a means to illegitimize the source it's trying to imitate? Try and detach yourself from your denialist mind a minute and imagine Patty is indeed real, then wouldn't the artificial knee merely be imitating a real knee for as much resemblance as possible? It then sounds very silly using that to then condemn the real leg.
The next source is a comparison shot of Patty's arm that's again terribly pixelated. We don't see the same muscle gerth achieved in the suit arm at all and laughably, in this shot we see exactly why Patty stands out; bending fingers.
Delete"Patty's hands bend precisely where all of the joints appear to be located...and that is one tricky feat to accomplish, with 'hand extensions'. It might even be beyond 'tricky'....it may be flat-out impossible. With all of the impressive features on this alleged "suit"...it is hard to understand why the designer/builder of it never came forward, to claim credit for his work. Maybe it's because....there was no suit."
- Sweaty Yeti
In this very comparison shot provided, we don't seem to get the same attributes from the artificial arm, to what looks like extensions. Frames 61 and 72 of the PGF reveal prehensile fingers, no extensions. Just to add, Bob H said no extensions, then Bob H did his joke of a recreation attempt and guess what... Wore arm extensions.
Next we have a suggestion of glued on fur, again... Take it away Bill!
"If you glue hair to a costume structure, you need a non-pourus outer surface (like some type of rubber "skin") because you can't glue hair well to either foam padding or fabric. The glue used is going to really stiffen up that surface, and that stiffness will result in some really weird and non-anatomical buckling and folding of that surface as the subject moves. You're talking about a relatively high level of skill to get even a low level of quality, which is why it's so rarely done."
I'll add here that the shot of Prohaska's glued fur looks nothing in the way of anything close to Patty's fur. Amusingly, we are then cut to a comparison shot of modern fake fat deposits that cannot move in relation to convincing muscle movement in sync with other moving muscle mass during movement, but rather dangle awkwardly... Without glued on fur.
Then... We 're shown a very modern version of a state of the art costume fake ape/monster hand that for the life of me I can't understand why someone would think would have been possible in the late 60's.
DeleteThen we have a fake plastic breast shining in the spot light, complete with taped around seems to what ever clearly fake material it's been attacked to... To which the comparison shot of Patty has nothing remotely of the sort. The person putting this video together has already shown on numerous times his own arguments to be lacking, at this stage his comparisons are helping enthusiasts out.
Next, a comparison shot of hair that again shows how bad an effort from the 30's was. The hair on the fake comparison looks artificial with no consistency, where Patty's does. Again the person putting together this video appears to be shooting himself in the foot.
Next; Slant Opening At Top, where this genius shows what is very obviously an example from a fake suit's zipper and then draws upon the upper chest/lower neck area of Patty that actually displays moving muscle that's in sync with all the other muscle groupings in that area of the subject's body. We see this here;
http://cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/p-g44-buresh/
Next; what appears to be a wet suit is used to signify the back, shoulder blades and spinal erectors area of Patty. Again, this cannot apply considering the very apparent muscle movement that's only just been mentioned. Also... What's it gonna be, a wet suit? A foam suit? How do you get hair to be glued on those materials and maintain muscle tone through all that hair? Again... The hole appears to get deeper.
Next; we see Patty track next to a fake track. You can tell the fake track straight away as the toes are ridiculously bad, one of the basic things to look out for when looking at fakes. The following edits are so poorly put together but seemingly so very irrelavent, that they're really not worth trying to make head nor tail of.
To wrap up... We do not once see anything of the comparisons in motion and certainly do not see any two examples shown at one time, to at the very least start to look like we have a bigger picture of how the 'suit' was made.
Got monkey suit?
I ain't dmaker. he doesn't hide behind anon like spanked footers
DeleteNo, he get's totally butthurt and makes an ass of himself like all the other sweaty denialist anons instead.
Delete; )
anon @ 11:10 is dmaker the sharkhead
Deletejoe just schooled anondmakerthesharkhead @ # joesschoolforjrefingidiotbuttplugriders....
DeleteNot so clever now, are you? Not a good 24 hours for you boyo.
Deletei ain't dmaker ladies, and i ain't worried about a ting!
Deletegot monkey?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQlPAFV6yaI
those suits are close, even the ones that predate PGF
23 swipes on my phone to get past that Joe meltdown.
DeleteGot monkey?
We have the monkey suits.
Got monkey? Just the one will do it.
the Star Trek beast was about the same period. If it was as shitty as PGF would be close.
DeleteHilarious!! One of the footers even commented saying how do we know both images aren't patty. Hahahaha fukin pwned by your stupid retarded dumb cult film.
Delete11:35... Nobody thinks you're Dmaker boyo, and after every single source in that link got exposed, someone's gotta ask... Where's ya monkey suit?
Delete11:37... One day you'll grow a pair and the literacy to get through that amour of writing, you got blown away.
11:38... Can't even understand you.
11:39... Got monkey suit? Those haven't quite cut it. Show us how every element of alleged suit anomoly can be put into one suit, that's in motion, then you'll have an argument.
Bro, you're gonna have to consult to JREF fundementalists over this one.
Joe just got so destroyed that he mistakenly let his guard down and went way out of his usual character. He exposed himself as one of the major obessesers at the bff. There is no way some random welsh guy knows that much about footery.
DeleteWho's your money on? Sweaty yeti? Mulder? Backdoc? DWA? Bill Munns? It could even be a jrefer trolling pretending to be a footer.
Whether the film depicts a man in a bad hair suit (it does) or an actual creature is really a moot point. To believe there are scores of these giants running amok is seriously, certifiably insane.
DeleteI got monkey suit. I got birthday suit too, and it is amazing.
11:58... Not a good 24 hours for you bro, ha ha!! This usual meltdown comes along when you're on the ropes, who am I from the BFF, like it's done mantle... How pathetic. No, this Welsh boy simply corrects you on your own back yard, the way it is.
Delete11:59... The source is far from moot, if you fail to test the source then there is a Sasquatch. If I were you, I'd get converting that birthday suit, you won't find much reassurance around here.
Got monkey?
DeleteWe got monkey suit:)
You thought you did, until 11:08... Go on, give it a read, ha ha ha!!
DeleteNope.
DeleteObviously there were suits.
Joe loses again, and makes it sweeter by thrashing so desperately.
^ yep :)
DeleteSuit 1. Foam that wasn't in suit in the 60's, accompanied with CGI (and still doesn't move like muscle).
DeleteSuit 2. Munns took apart Gemora.
Suit 3. A knee comparison that doesn't have the upper leg proportions.
Come on bro, show us a suit that incorporates just two of these alleged suit anomalies, not keep referencing different materials that contradict the other, not explaining the next proposed process of getting things like hair 'glued on'.... Not focussing on blurry pixelated examples of suit anomolies that we don't for one second see on motion.
I know you guys need reasurance, but bro, show us a damn suit.
WHAT THE !!!
DeleteOk guys. Get the time machine. We have to go back to 1967 to film a guy in a suit with the same camera. We'll be back in a jif.
DeleteEven then, joe would chafe and fidget and moan about this, that and the other.
What a PATOOT.
Nope... I'm actually in peace with what's in front of my eyes and can sleep at night that I'm not in any denial.
DeleteThis is just fun, showing some people how wrong they are.
you've gone barking mad. you are really that invested in a creature nobody's ever photographed, filmed or recovered one molecule from, and exists only on a crappy snippet that's 50 years old?
DeleteyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSh.
Considering that every single source of evidence exists short of type specimen, is it healthy to maintain the tunnel vision, denialist stance that there is nothing what so ever to the claims of an unknown primate residing in the wilderness of the US?
DeletePlenty found;
http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
... None caught.
J Randi for first gay President and me for first husband !
ReplyDeleteHillary then Obama again for our SAFETY : )
DeleteWe get it Parcher, you're gay but Randi's too old to be President and he already has a husband.
Deleteand Hillary will rule US all in 2016 already decided
DeleteHillary Clinton
DeleteShe’s not a Republican, so this confuses the Mika and the folks at MSNBC.
Joe revises, says she’s an “interventionist” and Chris Matthews says she’s a “centrist” on foreign policy.
Centrist means having moderate political views or policies.
So, invading Libya, killing 30,000 Libyans, turning a once relatively advanced nation (compared the rest of Africa) into a failed state and chortling about the brutal murder of Muammar Gaddafi on national television is, for Chris Matthews at least, centrist and moderate.
Makes sense. Especially for people who think sadistic Islamists in Syria are “moderate.”
old beerkeglegs ain't runnin nothin
DeleteBenghazi
Deleteits not Hillary fault !!!!
obama did not order stand down- he ordered a nine iron for a par three
Deleteans Uncle SAM goin take care of tham ISIS critters shure is
ReplyDeleteyes we will train and arm ISIS to fight ISIS
Deletewhat could go awry ....
It certainly lies well within the realm of possibility that PGF was 'a guy in a bad hair suit'. There is certainly less probability that the subject was some sort of unknown NA primate.
ReplyDeleteTo suggest that there are large breeding populations of these animals scattered across the continent is crazy talk. Either they are trying to sell you something or, they've gone a little funny in the head.
GRAYs have a clone and hybrid program they have bases all over the world
DeleteNo, a small breeding population, like that of grizzly bears. It's no big deal, relax 9:15.
Deletebut the GRAYs been cloning for years
DeleteAre you suggesting they have the same population as grizzlies? polar bears?
DeleteAnd yet we have zero biological evidence.
I suggest to you that the odds of their existence in this scenario is astronomically improbable. In fact, you are more than likely completely insane.
ain't nobody got time fer bigfoot and snallygasters... putins invadin europe in too deys... git yours guens and nifes reedy....fer yer safety and shit....
DeleteObambi onit!
Deleteyes Vote OBAMA in 2016
Deletefor your SAFETY
I laughed when I saw this idiot drop his phone.
ReplyDeleteFunny stuff. Something about Karma...
Lady in front of me at Verizon walked outside and dropped her 4s on the curb. Shattered it and was crying. After she Left we used her broke phone to test out the phone display cases. We put them on and proceeded to drop her phone. Hands down the best case was the inexpensive " hard sylicone" case. It was also the slimmest and cheapest. This was before the bulky otter box. 20$
DeleteMMC
I've never understood this mad craze to keep having the latest thing but i did feel sorry for him xx
DeleteHi Eva
DeleteI also use a zip lock bag to keep my phone dry. When it leaks I get a new one. Very inexpensive
MMC
Ahh,good idea MMC xx
DeleteAnd you don't have to take the phone out of the bag to use it. Try to find a bag that fits it good. Otherwise it doesn't look cool
DeleteMMC
http://www.inquisitr.com/1484957/vladimir-putin-threatens-world-war-3-says-russia-could-invade-europe-within-two-days/
ReplyDeletePUTIN STATES THAT HE WILL INVADE EUROPE....... fer yer safety......
^ let`s face it..he`s been provoked beyond reason by constant harassment and lies..and WHY is the new Ukrainian "government" of criminals that overthrew the legitimate and democratically elected government allowed to get away with this ? ..it would not be accepted anywhere else but suits the bigots tht rule our world to forget the event....utter hypocrisy by the west.
Deleteidiot^
Delete^ oh yeah ? for a start,the report you have quoted is a quote taken utterly out of context...you are the facking idiot for believing such utter rubbish...but you`re the type that would believe it...now fack off home for your sausage and chips...ya Ma`s calling
Delete10:18.. WHAT ? ..why,you cheap punk !
DeleteI like penguins.
Deleteans onlys tham stoopid folk be breedin
DeleteHahahaha joe got fukin pwned by that monkey suit video. Nice to see MMG aka packham obsessive dropping by to attempt some damage control.
ReplyDeleteFkin smoked.
Take a look up top, nerd. You got smacked about as usual.
DeleteOne day you just might grow a pair and a brain cell, think of your own argument and move on from just cheerleading your heroes.
No no. You got smoked. Denial of monkey suits is probably a worthy reason to seek medical help.
Deletejoe quit being such a sore loser
Deletesykes is coming! got monkey suit?
Come on bro... Why don't we see such obvious suit anomolies in one suit? These are so obvious, remember. We see blurry examples of suit examples that have nothing on the subject that's in that footage, most of which are sooooo old news and taken apart a long time ago.
DeleteEvery single source you can reference in that footage has been taken apart not just by myself, but the other gentleman up top.
It certainly is a case of "got monkey suit?" Ha ha ha ha!!!
Oh... And Sykes is still testing samples by the way.
; )
If you pay for it. Who wouldn't?
DeleteIf I'd have spent that much of my own money already, is certainly be asking people to cough up.
DeleteEspecially since ZERO evidence was found.
DeleteLet's add that up again.
0+0+0+0+0+0+0=0
I'm afraid JOE won again. As he does time after time after time and the ass clowns come back with the same tired rhetoric further exposing their complete lack of any intellectual discourse. Just run scared because they are not able to cope with the fact there are many thousands, probably over a million of the massive hairy giants in the forests here in NA, Australia, China, Himilayas, Caucausus etc. Since I was pretty certain of these hairy critters when I first saw PG in 1967 or 68, and became certain when I saw one for myself in mid 70s I would suggest to these nimrods to get out of the basement and go out into the forest and you may also come across one, but be careful as they can be most frightful.
DeleteNice work again JOE.
Chuck
Joe won by producing zero bigfoots and a massive tantrum?
DeleteSure buddy.
God bless you Chuck!!
DeleteOh... And 12:30... Plenty found;
http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
... None caught.
I saw the Ghost of Lizzie Borden last week. I can't prove it. I can't provide sound reasoning. Another person saw it, he's a doctor so he's credible. I knew it was her as soon as I seent her, I've seen ghosts on dat dere TV and pictures of Ms. Borden. I've recorded and heard sounds no man could produce.....
DeleteBlah blah spare me.
Prove it or lose it grandpa.
He has nothing to prove to you, you silly little nerd. Glad he got to you so much, truth hurts.
DeleteOh and 1:05... Just add an instance of physical and then biological evidence to those reports and you've got a senario that gives you a nice little headache.
DeleteThe only 'grandpa' about Chuck is he has twice the intelligence of you, like ya grandpa.
Oh... And look behind you, it's the ghost of Tom Joad.
So there were suits. Lots of them.
DeleteNobody reads your bs joe, except those that are already convinced anyway.
So you gained nothing.
We have a video that shows lots and lots of 60's monkeys suits.
You get nothing, you lose, good day sir! .
(That's was my Wonka)
It's very easy...
DeleteNow, let's put things into perspective; CGI, foam suits not available in the 60's, Gemora suits with lighting techniques, blurry limb focusses lacking proportions and explanations for toe & finger bending... None of these areas of focus are seen together at any one time on an example of a suit, and none of which we see in motion.
The only suit I can recommend you, is white with straps along the front.
Here is joes monkey suit. In fact many examples.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQlPAFV6yaI
Fkin pwned
^ run along home boy..yo` moma`s cooked yo` favorite sausage and chips for ya` tea...jelly for laters.
DeleteNice try joe
Delete^ go on..off you go..sausage ad chips eh ? mom`s got a dash of ketchup too
Deleteidiot^
DeleteTake a look up top 10:49... Oh and;
Deletehttp://www.smokeyjoesauces.co.uk
Got monkey suit?
DeleteYes. Yes I do.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQlPAFV6yaI
Suit 1. Foam that wasn't in suit in the 60's, accompanied with CGI (and still doesn't move like muscle).
DeleteSuit 2. Munns took apart Gemora.
Suit 3. A knee comparison that doesn't have the upper leg proportions.
Yeah... You got it alright.
And the PGF creature just happens to have all of the padding and seams that a suit does.
DeleteGot it.
Pwned again haha!!
Delete^ why,you cheap punk !
Delete12:28... Not in your wildest dreams, not even in that lighting, which is so obviously going to betray any suit anomalies, zippers, all the things that you claim that are there.
DeleteAnd laughably, you claim enthusiasts see things that aren't there?
Seams are the same. Padding looks the same.
DeleteI guess it was a suit.
MMG
It does not matter that packhams suit was different to the patty suit. To keep arguing that that is proof of bigfoot then medical help should be sought asap.
ReplyDeleteso says the guy sitting in the emergency room ^
Deleteobamacare cover all you healthcare needs and its FREE : )
DeleteA BBC budget... Telling.
DeleteAnd still it does not matter.
DeleteYou are reaching Joe.
It doesn't matter when you're trying hard for it to not matter.
DeleteI'll reach for another beer.
Trying to douse the smoke you gullible fool?
Deleteso says the guy sitting in the emergency room ^
ReplyDeleteemergency rooms covered by OBAMACARE and its FREE : )
Deleteobambicare is not free
DeleteObama said it was all FREE : )
Deletenope.gotta have insurance or you pay a penalty at the end of the year.yea, that's free
Deleteunaffordable careless act is a monster tax
Deletechoom boy decides how you live and when you die
obamacare we all get the same health care : )
Deletebad attempt
ReplyDeleteI would scratch that in yor diary as another da you just got served.
ReplyDeleteG-g-g-g-got m-m-m-m-monkey suit?
the fact that you feel it is necessary to editorialize every time it is mentioned means that it has you very worried.
ReplyDeleteSome of those suits were as old if not older than PGF.
the video really underscores the point that the creation of such a suit was easily within the grasp of a great many people during that part of the twentieth centruy.
It also proves that Joe got Chumped again.
joe..why give a toss what these morons believe ?
ReplyDelete^^ for an obsessive you really are wasting an awful lot of life..now..go home for your sausage and chips afore it gets cold.
ReplyDelete09-19-14
ReplyDeleteNever forget!!!!!
who would ever have guessed there were so many of the damn things? I bet my parents had them and wore them to parties.
DeleteThe best part is some of the suits look more realistic than patty.
DeleteAbsolutely smoked.
ISIS going to clean house -
Deletefor US all
^^^ yeah ...I BET they DID...the dirty fackers
Delete11:08... Soul destroying.
DeleteGRAY clones dont got 1 of them souls
DeleteWhat a wanker!!! Monkey suits all round.
ReplyDeleteJoe literally thinks there is no such thing as a monkey suit but has no trouble thinking there are giant hairy Indians running around and flying around in spaceships while shape shifting into other dimensions.
GRAYs set up these portals so that the BIGFOOTs can complete their DNA collections and safely return
Deleteknock knock howl howl mindblast
Delete11:40 ...finished your sausage and chips then ?
Delete11:44... Yet another day goes by, yet another day you post someone else's dribbles, and yet another day I kick it right back at you.
DeleteThere's only one reason you spend your time, all of your time thinking about how you're gonna get me next, and it's because you're a spoiled little brat that doesn't like being wrong.
Come on bro, what's next for me to dismantle?
ISIS dont eats sausage ors tham hawgs
DeleteNO SIR !!!!
joe's having a bad hair day in his bad hair suit.
Delete11:21... It just means I'm trolling you back, and loving it... No, the Gemora suit was the only one older and it's been taken apart in my very comment up top, by Munns. Old news.
ReplyDeleteThe video uses blurry, pixelated examples of suit anomolies and contradicts itself by overlapping methods that can't amount to any level of tissue replication you see in that footage. Just man up and read my comment, it would save ou so much time. And here in lies your self obliteration... If it were that easy then (should your delusion hold true) then why not since?
SFX seemingly get's worse as it develops, eh?
11:22... Cause it's fun, the average numpty represents the brainless, naive person who looks upon this subject, I use that to expose this approach as mere ignorance and fear.
11:42... Nargh, you thought you had.
; )
Got monkey?
ReplyDeleteWe the monkey suits:)
^ got nothing else to your delusions ?
ReplyDeleteINDONESIA: APE MAN CREATURE SHOT DOWN IN BORNEO JUNGLE
ReplyDeletehttp://worldnewsdailyreport.com/indonesia-ape-man-creature-shot-down-in-borneo-jungle/
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePharmaceutical Giant Dumps Live Polio Virus into Belgian Water.
ReplyDeleteTHE NEW NORM !!!!!
http://www.sott.net/article/285972-Secrets-the-CDC-wont-tell-you-about-SV40-Polio-vaccines-and-cancer
ReplyDeletethe new abnorm
Take a look up top... What's hilarious is you thought you were sooooooo clever until an hour or two ago.
ReplyDeleteNow, let's put things into perspective; CGI, foam suits not available in the 60's, Gemora suits with lighting techniques, blurry limb focusses lacking proportions and explanations for toe & finger bending... None of these areas of focus are seen together at any one time on an example of a suit, and none of which we see in motion.
This means you still need to show us a monkey suit.
Got monkey suit??
Joe is correct. The Youtube video is LAME.
ReplyDeleteDo some research regarding materials that were available in 60's.
What's next? Gimlin and Roger Patterson had advanced knowledge of CGI effects???
Unbelievable.
I would be totally justified in actually using that link to start proving the enthusiast's stance, it's that bad.
ReplyDeleteNot a bad idea.
Joe is incorrect. Natural creatures don't have such obvious seams and padding.
ReplyDeleteI will now walk slowly away, trying to stay in view for as long as possible. I hope men on horses with cameras and guns are watching. I will give them every chance they need to shoot me with guns or cameras. Then I will turn completely invisible for the next 50 years.
THe blogoshpere is lit up with reports of a bigfoot being hit by a party barge at Sausage Link State Park.
ReplyDeleteSuch obvious seams and padding, that nobody can point out in such direct sunlight.
ReplyDelete(Pfffft)
Patty is not an animal in the the same sense as a mountain lion or a bear. She is acting in the same way as you and me would react if we came across say a bear in the wilderness without a gun. There are also so, so many more accounts of Bigfoot behaving this way, too many to count in fact. It is almost a Bigfoot cliche in accounting that "I walked one way and the Bigfoot walked the other". The slow reaction is because she is merely of an equalled intelligence to us, and therefore is actually trying to remove herself from the situation as calmly and as safely as possible with no knee-jerk reactions that would cause panic to the two utterly foreign characters that are imposing themselves on her... You must remember that during this time, you have Bob Gimlin covering Roger Patterson with a gun, and you also have Roger Patterson pointing a camera at her, for all she knew this was a gun also or at least something that could have caused her great harm.
We do not know if there is an infant Bigfoot nearby (though this has sometimes been suggested by enthusiasts, though there is nothing to really back up this claim), and we cannot claim for sure that a male Bigfoot would behave that way (we have a matching specimen in Leaping Russian Yeti, a younger male acting quite differently). In fact we have too many accounts to suggest that they would react the same way as Patty does.
No, no... The pleasure's all mine.
Squatchmaster is an American hero. He proved that squatch actually talk backwards .
ReplyDelete