Another Patterson Gimlin Film Breakdown
We can't get enough of these breakdown, especially when it comes to Patty. In this video, this person takes a look at why the Patterson-Gimlin creature is not a hoax. "Can I say that it is 100% real? No. But I can say that it is one of the most convincing. It is also the video that all other videos have been compared to, and also the video that most hoaxers attempt to mimic," wrote the reviewer.
mammy
ReplyDeleteJoe is so stupid! He dosent know patterson hired Sandy Allen to be patty. Everybody knows this FACT! But then again
DeleteEven a busted clock is correct
2×'s aday. Yeppers sasquatch truly are homo sapiens sapiens!
HAAA,HAAAA HAAAA!
; )
Sandy Allen was 7'7''... The subject in the PGF footage is just under or on the mark of 7 foot. We know this because of the comparison McClarin shots... You poor dumb fool, ho ho ho ho ho!!
DeleteSomeone who clings to heresay in desperation, and didn't know humans were primates, isn't really in a position to pipe up dear boy.
: p
Gee his voice is annoying. Nothing new or original here.
ReplyDeleteI was thinking of doing my own break down of the Patty footage but since the Patty footage is of a real bigfoot i decided not to bother wasting my time :) xx
DeleteHey we would still like to hear yours anyway EVA R.
DeleteChuck
Lol Chuck,ok here goes!
DeleteLooks like a bigfoot.
Walks like a bigfoot.
No way can it be a man in a monkey suit,no suit good enough.
Not been replicated in nearly 50 years because nobody can do it although some have tried but failed.
Conclusion....Patty's a bigfoot :) xx
I will buy that EVA R. Around here we call it the duck test. Looks like a duck, walks like a duck, sounds like a duck, etc. Conclusion Must be a duck.
DeleteChuck
I am thankful for the countless times that scientists didn't stop with the duck test. Still waiting...
DeleteWhen did that happen? As far as I'm aware these 'countless scientists' (I'd like to know how many you can reference) haven't found a means to test the source sufficiently and reinforce their premises, audaciously they don't even appear to have a duck test in their favour.
DeleteAnd you're waiting for Subway to open... We know.
The duck test i like that xx
DeleteMore mental masterbation.
ReplyDeleteJust in time, I had almost forgotten about the last retard that did a breakdown saying Patty is real.
ReplyDeleteGot monkey suit?
DeleteThe Horses reactions cannot of been Hoaxed, remember that!
ReplyDeleteA very important point.
DeleteRight, but the film starts after Roger was off the horse. And the film does not show the horses, it is focused on the creature. I'm not saying this invalidates the film, but I am pointing out that besides the testimony of Gimlin and Patterson, we have not established any evidence for the behavior of the horses.
Delete"I yelled 'Bob Lookit' and there about 80 or 90 feet in front of us this giant humanoid creature stood up. My horse reared and fell, completely flattening a stirrup with my foot caught in it."
Delete"My foot hurt but I couldn't think about it because I was jumping up and grabbing the reins to try to control the horse. I saw my camera in the saddle bag and grabbed it out, but I finally couldn't control the horse anymore and had to let him go."
- Roger Patterson October 20th 1967
Al Hodgson was a witness to this bent stirrup and we know they were on horses because of footage of them prior to their encounter.
Flattened a stirrup? If the horse weighed 8 tons and was made of cast iron, maybe.
Delete"I am a cowboy, horses,ropes, etc. A long time ago some stirrups were made out of low carbon steel and would deform if a horse fell on one. We did not use them (cheap stirrups) because of the danger of having a foot caught should the horse fall."
Delete- NavySeal from the BFF
Thats eyewitness testimony, not proof. You assume the bent stirrup is related to the story. What that means is, you accept the testimony because it supports your viewpoint, not because of any falsifiable evidence.
DeleteAnd you deny it because it suits yours... Are you suggesting you're more worthy of doing so than me?
DeleteYou were in fact provided with explanations for everything you queried, and yes... In this case the eyewitness testimony does support my stance, it's not proof... But at least I've got that and you haven't.
You also have a habit of swallowing bullshit from people you don't know on the internet. There are more people online claiming to be former Navy Seals than there have been people in the Navy.
DeleteOooooooh, is that frustration I sense?
Delete: )
Check out the link I posted below Joe at the 1038:00 PM PST mark, now that video I must say seems/looks legit.......
DeleteThanks for link buddy!! It's pretty impressive!!!
Delete"It is also the video that all other videos"
ReplyDeleteYou're partly right, the first generation of Patty movie was on film and this made all the difference. A bunch of numeric movies would be easier or more difficult to debunk if they were on film and not on numeric data. The grains from films are more accurate than pixels.
*Check this out* Now this video I must say sure looks like the real deal folks and I wonder what it's holding in it's left hand as it walks away.........
ReplyDeletehttps://thedavisreport.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/calgary-bigfoot-video-animation-cropped.gif
I must agree with you my friend!! Thanks for the link!!
DeleteJoe,Now that's a video I must say again that look's like it could be a legitimate sighting of a Sasquatch! and need's to be further analyzed, would you agree and what in your opinion to what it's holding in it's left hand? if anything.........
DeleteIf it is indeed a stick... We move closer to the tool use of humans. Awesome stuff, thanks again buddy. Post more often.
Delete