Mitche Waite Explains Why It's So Hard To Convince Skeptics
In this video, Arizona Bigfoot researcher Mitch Waite tells a story of how some times it is very difficult to convince a skeptic.
BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
First!! MY GOD, WHAT A RUSH!!!
ReplyDeleteI find it increasingly difficult... But only because there are so few of them.
DeleteSo few what?
DeleteSkeptics?
Bigfoots?
Good first 9:01,now you've experienced the rush you'll want more,much more xx
Delete^Funny you should mention it. 7-9-15. Sprint Center. KCMO! YEP! RUSH!!! I got a woody....
DeleteRobert Lindsay says that he thinks females who act like males and vice versa, are welcome at his house any day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteAllow me to explain... There are very, very few sceptics because very few people apply true scepticism to anything these days. There are many psuedosceptics, or scofftics preaching the gospel of Scientism, who in the very process defy many principles of it... But that's it.
DeleteWhatever you have to tell yourself to keep from pulling the trigger.
DeleteI say who cares. Why waist a good breath? Why throw pearls too swine? You can't fix stupid. I say fvck em because they will always be skeptards
ReplyDeleteMMC
It's WASTE and TO. See. You can fix stupid.
DeleteIndeed.
DeleteBaiting these guys from time to time is just a bit of fun.
Never known a skeptic to be swayed by any existing proof or argument.
Only when they have that epiphany on that trail in the middle of nowhere and they finally realize that it ain't no bear...
MMG
OK GANG, I FIXED THE SUBTITLES, SO NOW YOU KNOW WHAT YOUR LOOKING FOR. PART 2 COMING, SAVED THE BEST FOR 2ND VIDEO.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NFO93MO5ic&feature=youtu.be
Awesome let's see it!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThanks DS!
DeleteMy pleasure! Just a recap for you and Chuck! Working on part 2 now.
DeleteRobert Lindsay says that when someone accuses you of being trans species, just shake it off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteYo, Shawn.He did no such thing.I was expecting something a little more thoughtful.
ReplyDeleteClassroom does experiment takes an nfl ball blows it up to 13psi in 76 degree class then puts in a bucket of 52 degree water and waits then check and gets 11.3psi case closed innocent! Let's get back to Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteCareful... you're discussing the scientific method on this blog. That's kind of taboo around here.
DeleteYou can't handle consistent scientific method... Makes you all cranky when it comes around. Let me know if you want it pointed out, yeah?
DeleteThat woman probably didn't want her husband to go back out with Mitch Waite because she thought he was crazy. The real reason it's hard to convince skeptics is because the evidence is so flimsy. For all we know Waite or someone else could have set this all up (if it actually even happened).
ReplyDeleteThe boys at Sanger Paranormal have a spot they take people camping for three day trips, only many pack-up and leave within a few hours of setting up camp ------- F'n pussies. I thought you skeptards wanted proof. "Oh were leaving, this isn't funny, we thought bigfoot was a joke, it's not funny scarring people. (we're all right here, we didn't growl or throw anything) Not funny, we're leaving and there is still no bigfoot. I don't know what that is but we're leaving.
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha Typical dumbass tards have to get thier head ripped clean off befor they will admit it, ha ha ha.
Paranormal and bigfoot residing together now? Yeah. They sound credible.
DeleteRobert Lindsay says that he has been offered a full time job teaching special needs children!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteTBP, why is it that Sanger Paranormal can consistently experience "rock throws" and "growls", yet can't produce any conclusive evidence?
DeleteYeah, sitting around in the dark listening to the sounds of bigfoot kind of reminds me of how seances were big back in the 1800s. Lots of excitement and just enough "evidence" to get people to believe but never any conclusive evidence.
Delete2:14... Next time you've got a day time bear at the wood line, go and get us some "conclusive evidence" of the encounter... Now... Next time you've unexpectedly got something growling at you from tree height in the middle of the night, throwing rocks at you in the middle of the woods, go and fetch us some "conclusive evidence", yeah?
Delete2:42.... It would have been great for those seance's to have scientifically backed and published audio recordings to be doing all that to, eh? One day you'll learn the meaning of the word "evidence"... Oh, and that book's called Manlike Monsters on Trial.
That's why Sanger Paranormal have then up the Million Dollar challenge to prove the paranormal by the JREF...
DeleteOh wait.
As a skeptic I would be convinced very very easily.
ReplyDeleteJust show me a body or any confirmed evidence of an actual bigfoot and youve won me over.
Rictor says he has a "Littlefoot penis" he'd love to show you!
DeleteI agree. No one would be more excited than me if bigfoot was real. But that isn't an excuse to assume they are real in the face of insufficient evidence.
DeleteYou see... If I was present at the time this comment was posted, this is where I give you plenty of reason to assume there is an unclassified primate residing in the wilderness of the US... Evidence you were either privy to and were therefore being rhetorical for moral gain, or you are ignorant of and then get angry cause your ego gets a knock.
DeleteWhen you have every source of evidence short of a modern type specimen representative of the current state of evidence, then this is where it get's tricky pointing it out to people who are no more "sceptical" than a fundamentalist is able to compromise, who are contented on a "version" of the current state of evidence that is perpetuated by ignorance in order to reassure.
It will be easy to convince steptards when there is convincing evidence.
ReplyDeleteCheck out my link above...PROOF!
DeleteSorry, DS. I don't find that to be convincing evidence.
DeleteNor do I.
DeleteI'm afraid I don't buy it either.
DeleteYou're in total denial then!
DeleteHere's part 2...you have to pause to see descriptions, sorry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXJdt5xuK5M
Me too. Show me something identifiable. Watch Mitch Waite sitting along in a caravan live blogging about the knocks and bumps he hears outside. His video and audio recording system was as crap as his spelling and grammar, and speculation on what the random sounds he was supposedly hearing could have been was baseless fantasy to the point of stupidity. Meanwhile all you can hear on the video is the whirring of his computer and thumping of him typing on the keyboard. THIS is why it's 'so hard to convince' skeptics.
DeleteKeep up the good work DS!!
DeleteOh, and 9:09? Please don't use the word "sceptic" in anything you put your vomit to... It makes you look far more intelligent than what you are and you really don't know the meaning of the word. Hint...
DeleteReserving judgment.
Joe there is no judgement to be reserved about this:
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-ts=1421914688&x-yt-cl=84503534&v=iOjgsP3RkGQ
where Mitch speculates a knocking sound picked up by his computer mic as possible communication by bigfoot. He suggests bigfoot may have deciphered his keyboard typing and are retransmitting his messages, perhaps using infrasound. If you listen with headphones on the sound in question is quite clearly associated with him typing on the keyboard and moving the laptop around. He says it isn't but you can clearly hear the sounds correspond.
Now you can choose to give Mitch the benefit of the doubt if you are feeling particularly charitable but to the rest of the sane world this form of bigfoot 'research' holds no value other than to make bigfooters in general look like idiots if they believe this sort of supposed evidence. This has nothing to do with skepticism and everything to do with supposedly experienced bigfoot researchers like Mitch Waite apparently unable to capture, analyse or learn anything useful from the data they are claiming is evidence of bigfoot. Instead when something, anything happens - in this case some bumping and electrical interference is audible only in the computer microphone - 'researchers' choose to immediately claim the unknown is from a bigfoot, no matter how wild or whacky that explanation appears, rather than to think about it for a few seconds to reveal the most obvious possible options.
Show me the Bigfoot and I'll be a 100% believer...........
ReplyDeletehttp://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
Delete... You only had to ask.
I often wondered if that p/g film was/is the real deal. Even die hard believers of Sasquatch are still not 100% sure if this p/g film is the real thing. So I ask again, Show me a Bigfoot and I'll be a 100% believer. Hopefully a live one as I believe there is definitely no need to have one killed just to prove there existence...........
DeleteSome die hard believers think Sasquatch teleport too.
DeleteGot monkey suit? No?? Well there's your "Bigfoot". Glad you are of the mindset that one need not be killed, physical evidence accumulated on location to support that footage should suffice... That's unless you're being rherorical of course?
As I say again, show me a Bigfoot and I'll be a 100% believer in this species,rherorical or not............
Delete... And in the source up top, is one on.
Delete