Is This The Most Impressive Bigfoot Footage Ever?


If this isn't up there with Patty, then it's probably one of the most impressive footage out there. BFE reader Ronald Von Beringe, the Naturalist sent in the following footage to us, and though we put this up there with the Florida Skunk Ape footage, this California footage is one of the best we've ever seen. Stay tuned while we try to get more information on this from Ronald. Ronald writes: "I was camping in CA last night. I had my Moultrie game cam set up in my tent in case I had any unexpected visitors while I was away. Attached is the result. The motion sensor has about a 10 second delay on this model (very frustrating!) so I can only imagine what occurred before this video."




Comments

  1. Troll in a ski mask wearing his extender on his nose

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't see a Mask, Suit or CGI. I CERTAINLY CAN'T PROOVE IT'S REAL!

      I also don't believe any of your excusses!

      Young Squatch, late teenage approximation. The one I saw was about a foot shorter and minus 50 lds off this one. Otherwise, identical side profile??????????????

      Boo ---------------

      Delete
    2. This thing does seem to have pain or old injury under right shoulder , ribcage or back.

      Hey Beansprout (shawn), Why don't you get a hold of Justin and ask him if this thing could bee the one he shot. Maybe this thing had a bullet throught it at one point, ha ha ha ha ha

      If your running with some Angle DNA, You probably have a supernatural abillity to heal from wounds, EH?

      booooooooooooooooo!

      Delete
    3. IF YOU WATCH CLOSE TROLLS, THIS THINGS NECK IS FORWARD AND ROTATED DOWN ON THE SHOULDERS COMPARED TO NORMAL HUMAN ANATOMY. yOU COULD SAY HIS HUNCH-BACK, EXCEPT HIS ABSOLUTLY VERTICAL.

      iT WOULD APPEAR THAT AS THIS THING GROWS AND PUTS ON BULK, THE NECK WILL DISSAPEARINTO THOSE SHOULDERS.

      i THINK IT VERY WELL MIGHT BE REAL.

      BOOOOOOOO -------- ROOOOOOKIES -------

      Delete
    4. Hey nature boy, This wasn't near Shaver or Huntington lake was it?

      Delete
  2. What a senseless waste of human life.

    Yeah, I'm looking right at you.

    My God

    ReplyDelete
  3. First impression is CGI

    MMC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you`re dead right...the whole movement of the "creature" is just plain wrong and exactly the same stilted movements we see in cgi films ... the only films with any possible veracity I have seen are the PG film and a guy who`s name I have forgotten ...ALL the rest are pure bullshite hoaxes.

      Delete
    2. This "Naturalist" is a character for a blog which is actually kind of funny. It's about paranormal and Crypto related things. It's all in jest.

      Having said that, if you want to be treated seriously why go by that pseudonym. Unless this film is in jest.

      Delete
    3. I think MMC nailed it. It is not natural at all.
      12 54 seems to know something about the creator and others on the youtube comment have expressed similar apprehensions.
      Chuck

      Delete
    4. Guys

      We were recently presented with a animation on environmental issues where I work. It was like a new level from the old crapp we have to watch. I asked the presenter where it came from and all she would say is she did it herself. So I figure it has to be a new package that one can create cgi on their PC. It also worked seamlessly with PowerPoint presentation software.

      Anybody out there have any ideas what it is ?

      MMC

      Delete
    5. ^ circles around you junior

      MMC

      Delete
    6. Definitely CGI... look at the "aura" around it. CGI and not even good CGI

      Delete
    7. Thank you for the kind words, 12:54.

      I assure you this video was not set up or manipulated by me in any way, shape or form.

      Delete
    8. Dear Naturalist. Your video is interesting and more importantly your serious researcher's hat kicks a$$.

      Delete
    9. Very kind of you, Mr. Brookreson.

      May I ask if you are amongst the Buffalo Gap, Texas Brookresons? If so you are from hearty stock!

      Delete
    10. I am sir. Your command of the genre and my lineage is impeccable.

      Delete
    11. TK! My man. I was just telling my friend the Naturalist not to be offended by some of these ham n eggers post im here. They are obviously not of his well heeled stock.

      Delete
    12. CGI popped at me as well !!!

      Delete
    13. Sometimes one must condescend to the level of mere humanoids for eleemosynary purposes.

      Delete
    14. Ah yes welcome back Naturalist. This video is as real as your adventures chronicled in your blog. You ever hook up with Autumn Forest?

      Delete
    15. @ 5:13 That, kind sir, is between me and Ms.Forest.

      Delete
  4. Another tent video, and this one is about as real as the first.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Randy, I was going to agree with you about this video. But then I received two separate phone calls. One from the Naturalists' hat vendor, and the other from his moustachery, both vouched for his character being beyond reproach in both the world of haberdashery and well coiffed facial hair. How can I contend with a persona this powerful ?

      Delete
    2. I see. So this is just a big joke then. That was quite obvious from the start.

      Delete
    3. Well, I'm thinking there has to be a little tongue in cheek humor involved. But the man's sense of style is no laughing matter.

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Marie, I don't mean to be rude, but many women respond to The Naturalist's sheer power of persona in a fashion similar to yours because they are intimidated by his sheer machismo. I ask that you cast aside your initial reaction and strongly urge you to reconsider.

      Delete
    2. "Sheer Machismo" was the name of my garage band in the 90's.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. The Naturalist is an adventurer worthy of Captain Jack Bindernagel stature, and I don't mean that lightly.

      Delete
    5. @5:29, I am moved (almost) beyond words.

      Delete
  6. the only ones that are clear are the worst of the worst hoaxes,they're all hoaxes but the clear ones are just awful.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So far the excuse has been that you cant get a clear pic because they mess up your camera or they can smell them or they just know what they are and that they're in the area and yet this one whom I would assume is retarded just walks by right in front of the tent without looking in or anything else.What you have here is a cult member trying to recruite some new members and that truly sad part is it will work.

    ReplyDelete
  8. U GOT A LOT OF DUMB COMMENTS FOR AN ASSHOLE WHO HIDS BEHIND A NAME LIKE,,, ANONYMOUS,,, UR COMMENTS HAVE ABOUT AS MUCH CREDIT AS A HOT LOAD OF SHIT FROM A PIG BARN,,, I DISMISS UR IDIOT POSTS AS NOTHING BUT THE RANTINGS OF A UN EDUCATED ASSHOLE,,, JUST SAYING,,,,LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure looks like it TOUCHED A NERVE WITH YOU,,,,,LOL,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,JUST SAYIN,,,,,,,,,,,LOL

      Delete
    2. You do realize you are one of those 'un educated' a-holes hiding behind the name anonymous with no credit who writes dumb rant comments, don't you?

      Delete
    3. PDT,,EVER SUCK A COCK U DIDNT LIKE ??? I BET U LIKED THEM ALL,,,,

      Delete
  9. There is no Moultrie with a ten second delay. Why would that even exist?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry bud, but I have a Moultrie with a long delay. Motion sensor goes off then a VERY long time before the IR cam starts recording. It's a good trailcam but it is indeed very frustrating!

      Delete
    2. A trailcam with a delay of 10 seconds is GUARANTEED to catch nothing.

      Delete
  10. "Is this the most impressive Bigfoot footage ever?" Answer; NO! To compare this animated cartoon looking footage to the PG Patty film is so ridiculous it it makes me laugh!

    ReplyDelete
  11. This site is getting so stupid I might as well read the Onion instead!

    ReplyDelete
  12. As stupid as rick dyers fake tent video...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will there be a platinum membership?

      Delete
    2. I do not know. But.... 1985, I was playing baccarat with Adam Davies, Tenzig Norgay's son, Danzig, and the Naturalist. "I say old sport, what say we up the ante?" The Naturalist then pulls from his London Fog trench coat the very Yeti finger that Jimmy Stewart's wife smuggled out of Tibet in her bra for Tom Slick and slaps it on top of the pile of international currency, "too rich for my blood" Davies replied and folded. There we were, face to face, myself and the steel gaze of the Naturalist I felt small swear beads rolling down my face onto my previously rolled custom cigarette. "You win this time Naturalist" I bemoaned, but tomorrow is another day."

      Delete
    3. Mike, give it up pal. Joe was just being kind when he called you a comedy genius.

      Delete
    4. We aren't pals. And you're Joe reference outed you instantly. Welcome back, we were all having a bit of fun. Now that you're here you can show us the antithesis . Let's see, Joe reference, inane vapid psychobabble, repetitive purile nonsense almost universally ignored, did I miss anything from your usual BS? Now I have to run. Now that you're here there truly is no genius or comedy to be had. Just a pu$$y whining about Joe and repeating catchphrases that weren't amusing the first time you uttered them or the 20th.

      Delete
    5. By the way, what's it like to have a homoerotic fixation on an internet blogger from Wales who hasnt posted here in months? :). You are nothing if not unique. Your next sad statement goes here:

      Delete
    6. Mike, don't you have a young woman to shack up with and some drugs to take?

      Delete
  13. It actually looks very real to me, especially in the hair color patterns and the heavy-footed gait. I wouldn't dismiss so so quickly.

    It is walking very upright which is unusual. However, I have a bad back and my chiropractor said anything that walks on two legs can suffer from back problems. Maybe this Bigfoot was injured... or old?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Me too. It looks like an old guy, with saggy muscles and boney shoulders.

      Delete
  14. Man or beast, I think we can all agree that this creature is gay.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It isn't CGI, dummies. It's a guy in a costume.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to disagree. I can see distinct musculature moving beneath the arms of this creature. Also: the hair - and its color variations - look very natural to me. If nothing else, this video deserves a closer look see.

      Delete
    2. Bullshit! You are the dummy! Looks like the product of an old version of 3D Studio Max.No doubt.

      Delete
  16. I must say that I am taken aback by all of these hostile comments. I am happy to defend my veracity but I will not abide any hostility directed towards Shawn. He is a gentleman and a scholar.

    Friends, I believe my footage to be the greatest evidence of the existence of the Timber Giant since the Patterson video.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr. Von Beringe, don't lump us all together. Many of us are intrigued by you and your footage!

      Delete
    2. ...Lol....I want to give you all my money...What is your email address?....

      Delete
    3. Shawn is far from a gentleman,and light years away from being a scholar,If you believe it is as good as you say it is,you messed up big time for letting this site get it's hands on it,you should have sent it to professional people.The fact that it wasn't,and posted here 1st,makes it questionable at best.

      Delete
    4. 10:34 is abholi,joerg,khat,nc,bonelicker1and merry may

      Delete
    5. Dear Naturalist. You are a gentlemen and a scholar. The movie portrayal of you featuring Robert Redford was gripping and realistic. I had no idea you were into Sasquatch Research as much as your beloved baseball.

      Delete
    6. Its every bit as real as the Patterson film, I'll give you that.

      Delete
    7. Screw these sketards around here Nature Boy!!!

      Our trolls around here haven'y seen the light of day in years, stuck in the basement with know key and not enough brains to crawl out a window. If a big'ole Squatch bit thier left ass-cheek off, they would still be in denial. WE JUST KEEP THEM AROUND FOR AMUSEMENT. kINDA LIKE WATCHING TO TRAINED BEAVERS PLAY PING-PONG!
      tHEY NEVER MOVE VERY FAR OR DO ANYTHING VERY DIFFERENT --------- JUST CRY AND YELL NO, SOME ARE PROBABLY SOCK-PUPPETS!

      Looks good, I saw a juvy of which I have never seen a photograph or vid that is so closely, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The SAME!

      Ha ha ha ha BOOOOOOOOOOO!

      Delete
    8. The Nauralist, good Sir, I wonder if you are perhaps acquainted with Bwana Clyde Batty? Oooga Booga!

      Delete
    9. A reference for the ignorant:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PSbkHO3R5Y

      Delete
    10. Don, if you're going to address The Naturalist directly he would prefer that you put on a sport coat and appropriate krevat or necktie before doing so. After all, we are not animals sir.......

      Delete
    11. YOU'VE WATCHED IT i ASSUME!


      HOW IS ALKY MOM?

      Delete
    12. Mike, good Sir, the tea is steeping and I recline in my new smoking jacket and appropriate ascot with pipe in hand.

      I am delighted that The Naturalist has decided to grace us here at this humble hole in the wall of the internetz. I believe his presence will raise the level of debate and discourse around here.

      Huzzah!

      Delete
    13. It is quite refreshing to have a well bred and refined gentleman to provide some class to this otherwise festering stink hole.

      Delete
    14. Mr. Naturalist

      I am a Bleever and also a skeptic of most all I see. My job requires skepticism and I apologize if I offended you with my CGI comment I just being honest. I also like your hat !

      MMC

      Delete
    15. Huzzah indeed, dmaker... and huzzah to you all, Penis Extender Guy included.

      Delete
    16. Anonymous@2:00, compliments on my attire and skeptical comments about my film are both welcome. This is an open forum after all!

      Delete
    17. Naturalist - Not everyone is an aggressive troll. I am very impressed with your video, myself. I think it deserves serious scrutiny.

      Delete
    18. Thank you kindly, Anonymous 8:22. Your faith is admirable.

      Delete
  17. Patty is rolling in her grave

    ReplyDelete
  18. Replies
    1. Its not going downhill. This is what Bigfoot should be. Entertainment.

      I like this 1800/early 1900 explorer schtick. I like Mark Anders. I like Rick Dyer. I like fictional Bigfoot movies.

      There as to be room made for thjis kind of material instead of constantly trying to explain a fake creature with pseudo science. That gets boring.

      Delete
  19. I need everyone to remain calm and take 3 steps back from your computer screen. Your breath and the moisture contained therein could interfere with the man's impeccable grooming

    ReplyDelete
  20. Comparing this video to the Patterson film is absurd. There are enough red flags in this video that make it laughable at best.
    Did Bigfoot have a rough day at the office or did he take it from behind from a large Grizzly?
    The walk is stiff and completely unnatural. Just admit your hoax and move along. Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I am disappointed that this site peddles obvious hoaxes. It's really a shame.
    I like Shawn, don't get me wrong. I just don't like the direction of the blog. All it does is muddy the waters and make it difficult for newcomers to decide who is legit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OK. I'll stop messing around. Hey Randy, if you get time check out Campfire Tales' recounting of last night's trackway and Class A encounter at the ranch. Pretty good stuff.

      Delete
    2. I had a class A encounter with a Jamaican prostitute last night which resulted in clearly defined trackways.

      Delete
    3. Please take measurements and don't forget to take a cast of it with hydrecal

      Delete
  22. People, this is as fake as a $3 bill.

    Yet another in a long line of bigfoot BS hoaxes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup. Trying to pass this off as the best footage since the PGF is laughable.

      This is a CGI bigfoot. Only a low watt bulb would fall for this BS.

      Delete
    2. And it's bad CGI to boot.

      Delete
  23. All these "CGI Experts" who have never worked in the field, yet can offer up professional opinions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All the bigfoot experts who have never found a bigfoot, yet can offer up professional opinions.

      Delete
  24. http://www.history.com/minisites/monsterquest/monsterpedia/images/sasquatch.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sorry, looks stilted in it's movements, have to say bad CGI. It all seems to be bollocks on here. Have any of you guys actually read Sykes' book? Only way forward to my mind, and his ongoing studies are looking good. Tim,U.K.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bad CGI it is.

      Only a real doofus would fall for this hoax.

      Delete
  26. I have the exact same train cam, why wasn't he recording in HD? I smell shenanigans due to lack of video quality.

    Nothing here compelling enough to sway the public. Keep working on it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story