Wow! We haven't seen this footage before. It appears to be a creature that somehow morphs into another creature. What could it be? YouTuber TheForestPond discusses the footage.
This guy took the flight and stabilization brains out of a toy quad copter and built this.
http://youtu.be/t5JgnMJzCtQ
I bleev that the birth of the long awaited "people's aircraft" has arrived My qx2 quad copter has a safe mode. If one were to incorporate that feature that would be fantastic
Where has all this dogman crap come from. Now we have two creatures that don't exist that everyone has sightings of. Should I start a dogman evidence site?
Does it? Compare a couple of sensationalist sightings for tourism's sake to three whole databases of contemporary reports, transitioning thousands of years of native cultures that have physical, biological, audio and video evidence to support...
Prove that leprechauns and unicorns don't exist then. That's right you can't. How does it feel to get owned by your own stupid logic. Your such a f ucking retard hahahahahahahaha
So either you think that bigfoot, leprechauns and unicorns exist or none do. You can't have it both ways. I personally think that none exist because there is no physical evidence. U?
Are you able to read like an adult? If not, then stick to Teletubbies sites mate, it really would be conducive for you to keep up with your peers.
There is not comparison of " Bigfoot" to leprechauns and unicorns, because there is no physical evidence to support the idea. In contrast, Relict Hominids have every source of evidence short of modern type specimen, and also have some of the most pioneering scientists in relevant fields investing enthusiasm.
3:53... Your burden is to show that the evidence that support the existence of relict hominids is not there, show me the alleged physical evidence for leprechauns and unicorns, and I'll be happy to help.
Your burden is that you can't prove your beloved bigfoot exists. I don't believe in leprechauns, unicorns or bigfoot. It's all a complete load of s hit. If people could prove bigfoot exists it would have been done by now and it would be known worldwide as a legitimate animal. It hasn't been proven yet and it never will be.
I've never claimed to have been able to prove that "Bigfoot" exist for that I would need a body. The only thing that I claim to be able to prove, is the evidence for an unclassified bipedal primate residing in the US.
If it's a "complete load of ***", then you'll have no problem in showing me that the evidence for that premise is bunk, right? This is so obvious, it must be easy to do, right?
"If people could prove bigfoot exists it would have been done by now" ... Would it? And who lays authority to that premise? Someone who brings to the table nothing more than a mere circular reasoning fallacy? This is why we have sightings, it's been "found" anything up to tens of thousands of times... Capturing one proves to be the only hurdle left, and there's plenty of missing hunters remember. If something exists, it leaves it's physical impression on the environment, and we have it in droves... If you've seen a dog in your back yard, and have tracks of it, filmed it, etc... You've found it but merely not caught it yet. We also have a world pioneering geneticist smashing apart the previously perceived time frame for relict hominids residing on the planet, by many, many thousands of years... What's 150 years from that particular hominid's existence in reflection?
Any way... In short pal, if you don't like it, show us the evidence isn't there. But you are apparently too stupid to even put into writing something that according to you, is so blatantly obvious... not a good look.
Do all experts believe in the evidence? Or is it just a small few whack jobs that believe in it. I bet for every whack job expert there is 10 normal experts telling them there full of s hit. Do you pick and choose your information? I bet you do.
The experts who have taken the time to look at the evidence; yes... Telling. These "whack jobs" in fact account for very reputable forensic experts, world beating geneticists and very credible primatologists. And that's just it... Those 10 people in comparison aren't even aware of the data, let alone analyse the data. Are we to expect someone as stupid as you to adhere to what someone who hasn't even looked at the evidence says?
It probably just fits in with your theory. Just like bigfoot being invisible, jumping through portals and sensing electrical devices. It's just lies on top of more lies in the bigfoot game.
Go look for yourself, try and find a source to conclusively show that the evidence isn't what it is... What you will find are only the same tiresome ill informed and badly supported arguments, totally naive of the current state of evidence. Either that, or idiots who claim to be honest, scientists who insist there is no evidence because from that premise, it makes heir stance easier.
And who invests enthusiasm in invisibility, portals and stuff? You will find 99.9% of enthusiasts opposed to such ideas.
6:01 "How DUMB are people ? ..creatures do NOT change their physical structures or attributes...GROW UP !!"
Ever hear of evolution mate ? How do you think small one celled creatures evolved into huge beasts we call dinosaurs ? It happens over a long time but it does happen. You're welcome for letting me school you again. Welcome back to school lad, recess will begin in a few hours where you can go out, run and play with your mates
Also in nature caterpillars change into butterflies, tadpoles into frogs. maggots into flies . Chameleons change color depending on their environment as well octopi can fit into the smallest of places so why can't Therianthropy be something more than just fantasy ? Sea polypes frequently alter the bentic and planctonic form, switching from anemone form to jellyfish form. this however incorporates TWO generations, most of the time.
on here regular human beings change into gruesome trolls so of course it happens in nature far more than we think.
That was your lesson of the day dear lad. Come back tomorrow and I'll teach you how to multiply and divide. all kinds of fun stuff you can later teach your school mates
8;04 ...there`s LESS evidence now for Darwin`s "theory" than when he first put forth his hypothesis...and there has been NOT ONE piece of evidence to suggest his theory is correct...remember that,NOT ONE piece yet found in more than 100 years.
I guess you`re the idiot here...spouting from books that others have written and claiming they`re part of your world knowledge...you have NO scientific knowledge whatever...you`ve barely any of your land`s CSE`s.
Oh,yes,you keep believing that bigfoot enters the world each day through invisible portals and leaves each bedtime via another shifting "door" of invisibility...then again,other days he decides to change shape and become a bird or a coyote...what utter ridiculous nonsense...stick to Hansel and Gretel or other fairy tales coz at least they make sense.
9:42 -please go back to school Toddler and lunch break doesn't count as education mate 9:54 - if a dogman decides to poop on your front lawn one day and you are left to clean up don't say I didn't warn you
I had a Dogman hump my leg once but he was nine feet tall so what do you do? That's right my homies you let him but for all that is good and holy don't try and help him clean up after.
Losing Faith? in he past 5 years, or so, 5-8 different "Bigfooting' clubs have disbanded. the reason: "Most of it members (on organized outings) have never seen or heard a Bigfoot"! When you have anywhere from 10-30 people go out into the woods,stay on established well used hiking trails, wear bright colored clothing, and all can't stop from talking, That's the reason, they will not be seen!. One club, that I thought was very serious about finding them, invited me as a speaker at one of their monthly meetings. I told them I have an area, that the Local Native Americans (Mohawks) swear is a "Core Area' where there have been numerous sightings of several family groups. they all got very excited and couldn't wait to go. until....I told them it would require a 3 day journey, we must stay near the area for at least 2 weeks, and B/C of the number of members that wanted to go, we must spilt up into 3 different base camps, at least 5 miles apart. All together, they said; "Fuck that"! Well I quests it going to take another 60 more years, with researchers like these!
has melba done it? will she be the one who has eventually proven bigfoot? let`s wait, everything is still not official yet, but on her fb page she published the following: HUGE NEWS: Our research has now been independently verified genome wise. I don't know when or how they'll come out with it and I'm not at liberty to say who yet, but it's finished and matches what we got down to the smallest details. Thank you, God!
Hey, there's some dog crap in my front yard. But, I don't know. If I take a photo from a particular direction, it looks like a Bigfoot. So I'm going to go with a Bigfoot. I've seen Bigfoot. Yipee!
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Can't say I am too impressed With the guy doing the narration But this film is actually very intriguing especially for those who have seen a dog man.
ReplyDeleteHa breaking out the one of your side accounts, who's next?
DeleteWho is this idiot narrating this. Interesting footage that may deserve some kind of analysis but not from this bozo
DeleteChuck
Hey guys
DeleteThis guy took the flight and stabilization brains out of a toy quad copter and built this.
http://youtu.be/t5JgnMJzCtQ
I bleev that the birth of the long awaited "people's aircraft" has arrived My qx2 quad copter has a safe mode. If one were to incorporate that feature that would be fantastic
MMC
and black lives MATTER
Deletereckon tham sumbitch bigfoots bein smurt sos u needin to be smurt to trapd tham critters
DeleteIt is some form of CAT...and it LOOKS like a CAT.
Deleteor a dang chupacabra........
DeleteDog turd more like it.
ReplyDeleteWhere has all this dogman crap come from. Now we have two creatures that don't exist that everyone has sightings of. Should I start a dogman evidence site?
ReplyDelete"Now we have two creatures that don't exist that everyone has sightings of."
DeleteWho's gonna be the first to point out where Einstein here has made himself look stupid again?
There is a website called irelandseye that has leprechaun sightings there is also unicorn sightings too. Do they both exist?
DeleteDoes it? Compare a couple of sensationalist sightings for tourism's sake to three whole databases of contemporary reports, transitioning thousands of years of native cultures that have physical, biological, audio and video evidence to support...
DeleteAnd I just might.
Hey Einstein at 2:27, you made yourself look stupid again.
DeleteProve that leprechauns and unicorns don't exist then. That's right you can't. How does it feel to get owned by your own stupid logic. Your such a f ucking retard hahahahahahahaha
DeleteAnd how's that? By showing your contradiction? Seriously, where are all the adults??
Delete3:15... I don't have to, because there is no physical evidence to support the idea of leprechauns and unicorns...And nobody is seeing them.
Jeeeeeeeez, where are all the adults???
So either you think that bigfoot, leprechauns and unicorns exist or none do. You can't have it both ways. I personally think that none exist because there is no physical evidence. U?
DeleteSo you also think that prove they don't exist is a ridiculous argument only a retard would use.
Delete(Sigh)
DeleteAre you able to read like an adult? If not, then stick to Teletubbies sites mate, it really would be conducive for you to keep up with your peers.
There is not comparison of " Bigfoot" to leprechauns and unicorns, because there is no physical evidence to support the idea. In contrast, Relict Hominids have every source of evidence short of modern type specimen, and also have some of the most pioneering scientists in relevant fields investing enthusiasm.
Do you understand what physical evidence means?
http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/90-anatomy-and-dermatoglyphics-of-three-sasquatch-footprints
3:53... Your burden is to show that the evidence that support the existence of relict hominids is not there, show me the alleged physical evidence for leprechauns and unicorns, and I'll be happy to help.
DeleteYour burden is that you can't prove your beloved bigfoot exists. I don't believe in leprechauns, unicorns or bigfoot. It's all a complete load of s hit. If people could prove bigfoot exists it would have been done by now and it would be known worldwide as a legitimate animal. It hasn't been proven yet and it never will be.
DeleteI've never claimed to have been able to prove that "Bigfoot" exist for that I would need a body. The only thing that I claim to be able to prove, is the evidence for an unclassified bipedal primate residing in the US.
DeleteIf it's a "complete load of ***", then you'll have no problem in showing me that the evidence for that premise is bunk, right? This is so obvious, it must be easy to do, right?
"If people could prove bigfoot exists it would have been done by now"
... Would it? And who lays authority to that premise? Someone who brings to the table nothing more than a mere circular reasoning fallacy? This is why we have sightings, it's been "found" anything up to tens of thousands of times... Capturing one proves to be the only hurdle left, and there's plenty of missing hunters remember. If something exists, it leaves it's physical impression on the environment, and we have it in droves... If you've seen a dog in your back yard, and have tracks of it, filmed it, etc... You've found it but merely not caught it yet. We also have a world pioneering geneticist smashing apart the previously perceived time frame for relict hominids residing on the planet, by many, many thousands of years... What's 150 years from that particular hominid's existence in reflection?
Any way... In short pal, if you don't like it, show us the evidence isn't there. But you are apparently too stupid to even put into writing something that according to you, is so blatantly obvious... not a good look.
Your burden remains.
Do all experts believe in the evidence? Or is it just a small few whack jobs that believe in it. I bet for every whack job expert there is 10 normal experts telling them there full of s hit. Do you pick and choose your information? I bet you do.
DeleteThe experts who have taken the time to look at the evidence; yes... Telling. These "whack jobs" in fact account for very reputable forensic experts, world beating geneticists and very credible primatologists. And that's just it... Those 10 people in comparison aren't even aware of the data, let alone analyse the data. Are we to expect someone as stupid as you to adhere to what someone who hasn't even looked at the evidence says?
DeleteDamn straight we do.
So you know for a fact that the normal non whack job experts don't know about the data.
DeleteIt probably just fits in with your theory. Just like bigfoot being invisible, jumping through portals and sensing electrical devices. It's just lies on top of more lies in the bigfoot game.
DeleteGo look for yourself, try and find a source to conclusively show that the evidence isn't what it is... What you will find are only the same tiresome ill informed and badly supported arguments, totally naive of the current state of evidence. Either that, or idiots who claim to be honest, scientists who insist there is no evidence because from that premise, it makes heir stance easier.
DeleteAnd who invests enthusiasm in invisibility, portals and stuff? You will find 99.9% of enthusiasts opposed to such ideas.
Question - is it a skinwalker ?
DeleteAnswer - what the feck do you think !!
How DUMB are people ? ..creatures do NOT change their physical structures or attributes...GROW UP !!
6:01 "How DUMB are people ? ..creatures do NOT change their physical structures or attributes...GROW UP !!"
DeleteEver hear of evolution mate ? How do you think small one celled creatures evolved into huge beasts we call dinosaurs ? It happens over a long time but it does happen.
You're welcome for letting me school you again. Welcome back to school lad, recess will begin in a few hours where you can go out, run and play with your mates
Joe
Also in nature caterpillars change into butterflies, tadpoles into frogs. maggots into flies . Chameleons change color depending on their environment as well octopi can fit into the smallest of places so why can't Therianthropy be something more than just fantasy ?
DeleteSea polypes frequently alter the bentic and planctonic form, switching from anemone form to jellyfish form. this however incorporates TWO generations, most of the time.
on here regular human beings change into gruesome trolls so of course it happens in nature far more than we think.
That was your lesson of the day dear lad. Come back tomorrow and I'll teach you how to multiply and divide. all kinds of fun stuff you can later teach your school mates
Joe
8;04 ...there`s LESS evidence now for Darwin`s "theory" than when he first put forth his hypothesis...and there has been NOT ONE piece of evidence to suggest his theory is correct...remember that,NOT ONE piece yet found in more than 100 years.
DeleteI guess you`re the idiot here...spouting from books that others have written and claiming they`re part of your world knowledge...you have NO scientific knowledge whatever...you`ve barely any of your land`s CSE`s.
9;26,
DeleteOh,yes,you keep believing that bigfoot enters the world each day through invisible portals and leaves each bedtime via another shifting "door" of invisibility...then again,other days he decides to change shape and become a bird or a coyote...what utter ridiculous nonsense...stick to Hansel and Gretel or other fairy tales coz at least they make sense.
9:42 -please go back to school Toddler and lunch break doesn't count as education mate
Delete9:54 - if a dogman decides to poop on your front lawn one day and you are left to clean up don't say I didn't warn you
Joe
^ No worries there...one of the garden gnomes will chase him off.
DeleteI had a Dogman hump my leg once but he was nine feet tall so what do you do? That's right my homies you let him but for all that is good and holy don't try and help him clean up after.
ReplyDeleteI'm calling hoaxed BS.
ReplyDeleteThis looks like someone in a costume. And of course the footage is out of focus. That's clue no. 1 that this is more cryptid BS.
Bear
ReplyDelete1%
Losing Faith?
ReplyDeletein he past 5 years, or so, 5-8 different "Bigfooting' clubs have disbanded. the reason: "Most of it members (on organized outings) have never seen or heard a Bigfoot"!
When you have anywhere from 10-30 people go out into the woods,stay on established well used hiking trails, wear bright colored clothing, and all can't stop from talking, That's the reason, they will not be seen!.
One club, that I thought was very serious about finding them, invited me as a speaker at one of their monthly meetings. I told them I have an area, that the Local Native Americans (Mohawks) swear is a "Core Area' where there have been numerous sightings of several family groups. they all got very excited and couldn't wait to go. until....I told them it would require a 3 day journey, we must stay near the area for at least 2 weeks, and B/C of the number of members that wanted to go, we must spilt up into 3 different base camps, at least 5 miles apart.
All together, they said; "Fuck that"!
Well I quests it going to take another 60 more years, with researchers like these!
Not only have you seen this before Shawn, but your buddy Parabreakdown broke it down; twice. It's a dog.
ReplyDeleteYeah..true dat. I remember it well.
Deletehas melba done it? will she be the one who has eventually proven bigfoot? let`s wait, everything is still not official yet, but on her fb page she published the following:
ReplyDeleteHUGE NEWS: Our research has now been independently verified genome wise. I don't know when or how they'll come out with it and I'm not at liberty to say who yet, but it's finished and matches what we got down to the smallest details. Thank you, God!
This must be the second round of testing they were on about.
DeleteOh well, let's see what happens.
Well 6 28. If indeed this is true it will be most welcome news.
DeleteAs for the subject above 6 10 says it is a dog. RUFF READY says dog and he out to know one when he sees one. Woof Woof
Chuck
Ha!!
DeleteTrue Dat!!
DeleteHey, there's some dog crap in my front yard. But, I don't know. If I take a photo from a particular direction, it looks like a Bigfoot. So I'm going to go with a Bigfoot. I've seen Bigfoot. Yipee!
ReplyDeleteIt's actually 2 clips (poorly) merged to appear to be one whole clip...first one is likely a cat, the second is a bear.
ReplyDeleteDogman?
More like Catbear.